PFAS20/ 100Bad
Overall12/ 100Bad
Arc'teryx Aerio 35 Backpack

Arc'teryx · Backpacks

Arc'teryx Aerio 35 Backpack

Bad

Moderate uncertainty with no public PFAS transparency; consider caution if PFAS sensitivity matters.

Verdict: SkipDurable nylon/polyester pack with unspecified water-repellent coating and no PFAS transparency; safe for typical use but warrant caution on water treatment chemicals if PFAS-sensitive.

This backpack uses nylon and polyester ripstop with an unspecified water-repellent coating typical of outdoor gear. Arc'teryx does not publicly disclose the chemical composition of its water-resistant treatments.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Nylon/polyester ripstop with water-repellent coating (unspecified)

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent treatments have historically contained PFAS chemicals.

65/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

PFAS exposure happens more often with clothing products.

70/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

The company has not publicly discussed PFAS in this product.

85/ 100

water-repellent coating degradation and chemical release

Arc'teryx does not disclose water-repellent coating formulation. If fluorinated (C8/C6 PFAS or C6 alternatives), normal use poses minimal risk, but heat, UV exposure, or repeated washing may accelerate coating breakdown and particle/vapor release over years of use. No testing data on this specific model is public.

70/ 100
🫧

Microplastic shedding from ripstop fabric

Nylon and polyester fabrics shed microscopic fibers during wear and washing, particularly at stress points and seams. This is not specific to Arc'teryx but inherent to synthetic textiles; shedding volume is low for a backpack used in dry conditions, higher after machine washing. Environmental impact is greater concern than direct user health.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

Stitching and adhesive leachables

Arc'teryx uses industrial thread and seam-sealing adhesives typical of outdoor gear. No reports of harmful leaching or allergic reactions from stitching on this model. Polyester thread and urethane-based seam sealers are chemically stable under normal backpack use.

95/ 100
🔥

Flame retardants

No evidence that the Aerio 35 receives intentional flame retardant treatment. Nylon and polyester inherently have moderate flammability but are not regulated textiles requiring additive flame retardants in backpack applications.

Source: EPA
95/ 100
⛏️

Heavy metals

Arc'teryx uses standard commercial dyeing processes for nylon and polyester. No recalls or testing findings indicate lead, cadmium, or other heavy metal contamination. Modern textile dyes are regulated in most markets where the brand sources; specific lot testing is not publicly available.

Source: FDA
95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

The Aerio 35 uses nylon and polyester ripstop fabrics, which are stable synthetic polymers that do not leach monomers under normal backpack use conditions. The water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) coating is the chemical wildcard: Arc'teryx does not publicly disclose whether this uses C8/C6 PFAS, fluorocarbon-free alternatives, or another chemistry. Ripstop weaves are mechanically reinforced, reducing stress-point failure; the material itself poses no inherent toxicity risk during wear, but the water-repellent coating formulation's composition remains opaque.

The brand's record and disclosure

Arc'teryx is a subsidiary of Salomon/Amer Sports and markets itself as a premium outdoor/technical brand, but does not maintain a public chemical transparency policy or PFAS commitment statement comparable to some competitors (e.g., Patagonia's PFAS phase-out announcements). No major recalls or safety controversies are on record for this model. The brand's silence on water-repellent coating chemistry is noteworthy given that fluorinated water repellents have become a consumer and regulatory scrutiny point; lack of disclosure does not indicate presence, but it limits informed choice.

How it compares in its category

Mid-range hiking packs in this weight and volume class (30-40L) commonly use water-repellent coating-treated nylon. Brands offering greater chemical transparency include Patagonia (explicit PFAS-free water-repellent coating on many packs) and some ultralight specialists using PFC-free alternatives. Arc'teryx's lack of public disclosure puts it in a middle position: no known violations, but fewer assurances than leaders in sustainable sourcing. The 35L size and construction quality are competitive for the price tier.

If you buy it

Use the pack as intended for hiking and travel without concern for leaching or degradation under normal wear. Avoid prolonged heat exposure (do not leave sealed in direct sun or near heat sources), as synthetic fabrics can soften and water-repellent coating coatings can degrade, potentially releasing volatile compounds. Wash with cool water and mild soap when soiled; harsh detergents or hot water may accelerate coating breakdown. If PFAS exposure is a personal priority, contact Arc'teryx directly to request water-repellent coating formulation details before purchase, or choose a competitor with published fluorine-free certifications.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 45% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Arc'teryx has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

More backpacks grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.