Green Valley Pro 105 vs SeeGreen 5 ft. W X 7 ft. L Green Polypropylene Astroturf: which is safer?
Green Valley Pro 105 is our pick, better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.
Our pick
Green Valley Pro 105
PFAS grade
Overall grade
Verdict
Hazard flags
Material
Confidence
PossibleBacking material leachables (unknown composition)
PossibleHeavy metals in colorants
PossibleVOC off-gassing from UV stabilizers and processing aids
AstroTurf
SeeGreen 5 ft. W X 7 ft. L Green Polypropylene Astroturf
PFAS grade
Overall grade
Verdict
Hazard flags
Material
Confidence
PossibleVOC off-gassing from polyurethane or latex adhesive
LikelyPolypropylene UV degradation and microplastic shedding
ReportedBacking adhesive failure and fiber separation
Where these two actually differ
- We flag Backing material leachables (unknown composition), Heavy metals in colorants, VOC off-gassing from UV stabilizers and processing aids and Microfiber shedding and soil contamination on the and not on the AstroTurf.
- We flag VOC off-gassing from polyurethane or latex adhesive, Polypropylene UV degradation and microplastic shedding, Backing adhesive failure and fiber separation and Infill contamination (if rubber granules used) on the AstroTurf and not on the .
- The is Polyethylene (PE) synthetic fibers, backing unknown where the AstroTurf is Polypropylene (PP) astroturf, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
- These two are level, close enough that price and fit should decide it rather than our grade.
- We are less certain about the grade, at 45% confidence against 72%, because it discloses less.
Both products run through the same public rubric, which covers materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →
More artificial turf, see the full ranking