Miracle Volume Shampoo vs Apple Cider Vinegar Shampoo: which is safer?

Aveeno Apple Cider Vinegar Shampoo is our pick, better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.

Aussie Miracle Volume Shampoo

Aussie

Miracle Volume Shampoo

PFAS grade

Excellent 75/100

Overall grade

Good 59/100

Verdict

Buy

Hazard flags

⚑ 4

Material

aqueous shampoo base, surfactants, botanical extracts

Confidence

78%

Possible1,4-dioxane (manufacturing contaminant)

PossibleFragrance allergens and sensitivizers

PossibleFormaldehyde releasers (preservative byproducts)

Our pick

Aveeno Apple Cider Vinegar Shampoo

Aveeno

Apple Cider Vinegar Shampoo

PFAS grade

Excellent 75/100

Overall grade

Good 63/100

Verdict

Buy

Hazard flags

⚑ 3

Material

aqueous liquid shampoo (typical surfactants, conditioning agents, water)

Confidence

82%

PossibleSurfactant irritation (skin/eye contact)

PossibleFragrance allergens

PossibleMicrobial contamination (post-purchase)

Where these two actually differ

  • We flag 1,4-dioxane (manufacturing contaminant), Fragrance allergens and sensitivizers, Formaldehyde releasers (preservative byproducts) and Microbial growth (if contaminated or stored improperly) on the Aussie and not on the Aveeno.
  • We flag Surfactant irritation (skin/eye contact), Fragrance allergens and Microbial contamination (post-purchase) on the Aveeno and not on the Aussie.
  • The Aussie is aqueous shampoo base, surfactants, botanical extracts where the Aveeno is aqueous liquid shampoo (typical surfactants, conditioning agents, water), which is most of the difference in these two grades.
  • These two are level, close enough that price and fit should decide it rather than our grade.

Both products run through the same public rubric, which covers materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →

More shampoo, see the full ranking