PFAS75/ 100Excellent
Overall59/ 100Good
Aussie Miracle Volume Shampoo

Aussie · Shampoo

Aussie Miracle Volume Shampoo

Excellent

Lower concern. Liquid shampoo unlikely to contain intentional PFAS.

Verdict: BuyAqueous shampoo with low hazard profile; no major public safety alerts; standard cosmetic formulation poses minimal consumer risk.

Aussie Miracle Volume Shampoo is a rinse-off cosmetic with no known PFAS-associated ingredients or treatments. No brand PFAS disclosure available, but formulation type presents lower risk profile.

Check price on Amazon →

We flunk more products than we pass. This one earned its grade. How we grade

Material

aqueous shampoo base, surfactants, botanical extracts

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

cosmetics is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

80/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
🏭

1,4-dioxane (manufacturing contaminant)

Rinsed-off shampoos pose minimal acute risk even if trace 1,4-dioxane is present, since exposure is brief and skin contact is followed by washing. No specific test data for this product is publicly available; the hazard is a general concern in surfactant-based cosmetics rather than a brand-specific issue.

70/ 100
⚠️

Fragrance allergens and sensitivizers

Aussie products typically contain fragrance blends that may include common allergens (limonene, linalool, citral). Individuals with sensitive scalp or fragrance intolerance may experience contact dermatitis; the botanical branding does not indicate hypoallergenic or fragrance-free formulation.

70/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Aqueous shampoos may contain preservatives that release trace formaldehyde over time to prevent microbial growth. Rinsed-off products limit exposure, but individuals with formaldehyde sensitivity may react during application or storage in warm bathrooms.

Source: ATSDR
70/ 100
⚠️

Microbial growth (if contaminated or stored improperly)

Water-based formulations are susceptible to bacterial and fungal growth if the bottle is not sealed properly or stored in damp conditions. Consumer-side contamination risk is low if best practices (keep cap sealed, avoid standing water inside nozzle) are followed.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

Safe base material

Made from a material with no inherent PFAS use (ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber).

100/ 100
⛏️

Heavy metals

No published safety alerts or recalls document heavy metal contamination in Aussie shampoos. The product is colorless or pale (typical of botanical extracts), reducing the likelihood of synthetic colorant use and associated heavy metal burden.

Source: FDA
95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Aussie Miracle Volume Shampoo is a water-based surfactant blend with botanical extracts (eucalyptus, tea tree oil derivatives are common in Aussie lines). The primary concern in any shampoo is surfactant purity and impurity content, particularly secondary contaminants like 1,4-dioxane that can arise during manufacturing. Aqueous formulations are inherently lower-risk than rinse-off products with heavy fragrance loads or silicone resins, since most ingredients are diluted and washed away.

The brand's record and disclosure

Aussie is owned by Procter & Gamble, a large multinational with mixed transparency on cosmetic ingredient sourcing. The brand does not maintain a public hazard or PFAS disclosure statement specific to this product line. P&G has faced historical scrutiny for formulation opacity but complies with FDA cosmetic regulations in the US and equivalent standards in other markets. No major recalls or safety alerts targeting Aussie shampoos have been publicly documented in recent years.

How it compares in its category

Mass-market drugstore shampoos like Aussie typically contain fewer declared active ingredients than premium or specialized brands, which can reduce complexity but does not guarantee lower contamination risk. Aussie positions itself as budget-friendly and widely available, meaning formulation tends toward cost efficiency rather than clean-label sourcing. Compared to fragrance-heavy conditioners or leave-in treatments, rinse-off shampoos present lower dermal exposure and cumulative chemical load.

If you buy it

Use as directed on the label; no special storage conditions are required beyond keeping the bottle sealed and cool. Rinse thoroughly to minimize residue buildup on the scalp. If scalp irritation, itching, or rash develops, discontinue and rinse with water; contact a dermatologist if symptoms persist. Store away from direct heat and sunlight to preserve surfactant stability; replace bottle if separation, odor change, or visible discoloration occurs (typically every 1-2 years even when unopened).

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 78% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Aussie has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Safer alternatives in Shampoo

Roz Salt Scalp Scrub

Credo Beauty

Roz Salt Scalp Scrub

salt crystals, mineral-based scrub

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade86Excellent
🏷️

Fragrance allergens or undisclosed fragrance components

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Mechanical irritation from crystal size and shape

Moderate concern

45

Low risk, salt scrub formulation carries minimal PFAS concern.

Credo Beauty certification

Verified PFAS-free by a third party

Public Goods Shampoo Refill

Puracy

Public Goods Shampoo Refill

aqueous surfactant-based liquid shampoo

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade88Excellent
⚠️

1,4-dioxane (surfactant byproduct)

Limited concern

70
🏷️

Fragrance allergens (undisclosed components)

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Bacterial or mold growth in refill container

Limited concern

70

Lower concern for a MADE SAFE certified shampoo avoiding fluorinated ingredients.

MADE SAFE

Verified PFAS-free by a third party

Puracy Natural Shampoo

Puracy

Natural Shampoo

aqueous surfactants, plant-derived cleansers

PFAS Grade90Excellent
Overall Grade78Excellent
⚠️

1,4-dioxane (contaminant in ethoxylated surfactants)

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Fragrance allergens and sensitizers

Limited concern

70
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Limited concern

70

Lower concern for a liquid shampoo with minimal PFAS risk in this category.

Risky category by default

More shampoo grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.