Apple Cider Vinegar Shampoo vs HydraSource Shampoo Matrix: which is safer?

Aveeno Apple Cider Vinegar Shampoo is our pick, better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.

Our pick

Aveeno Apple Cider Vinegar Shampoo

Aveeno

Apple Cider Vinegar Shampoo

PFAS grade

Excellent 75/100

Overall grade

Good 63/100

Verdict

Buy

Hazard flags

⚑ 3

Material

aqueous liquid shampoo (typical surfactants, conditioning agents, water)

Confidence

82%

PossibleSurfactant irritation (skin/eye contact)

PossibleFragrance allergens

PossibleMicrobial contamination (post-purchase)

Biolage HydraSource Shampoo Matrix

Biolage

HydraSource Shampoo Matrix

PFAS grade

Excellent 75/100

Overall grade

Good 53/100

Verdict

Buy

Hazard flags

⚑ 4

Material

aqueous shampoo formulation (water, surfactants, conditioning agents)

Confidence

72%

Possible1,4-dioxane (manufacturing contaminant)

PossibleFormaldehyde releasers (preservative system)

ReportedFragrance allergens (undisclosed components)

Where these two actually differ

  • We flag Surfactant irritation (skin/eye contact), Fragrance allergens and Microbial contamination (post-purchase) on the Aveeno and not on the Biolage.
  • We flag 1,4-dioxane (manufacturing contaminant), Formaldehyde releasers (preservative system), Fragrance allergens (undisclosed components) and Microbial contamination if stored improperly on the Biolage and not on the Aveeno.
  • The Aveeno is aqueous liquid shampoo (typical surfactants, conditioning agents, water) where the Biolage is aqueous shampoo formulation (water, surfactants, conditioning agents), which is most of the difference in these two grades.
  • These two are level, close enough that price and fit should decide it rather than our grade.

Both products run through the same public rubric, which covers materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →

More shampoo, see the full ranking