Apple Cider Vinegar Shampoo vs Thickening Volume Shampoo: which is safer?

These two grade almost identically. Pick on price and preference; neither has a PFAS edge.

Aveeno Apple Cider Vinegar Shampoo

Aveeno

Apple Cider Vinegar Shampoo

PFAS grade

Excellent 75/100

Overall grade

Good 63/100

Verdict

Buy

Hazard flags

⚑ 3

Material

aqueous liquid shampoo (typical surfactants, conditioning agents, water)

Confidence

82%

PossibleSurfactant irritation (skin/eye contact)

PossibleFragrance allergens

PossibleMicrobial contamination (post-purchase)

Bumble and Bumble Thickening Volume Shampoo

Bumble and bumble

Thickening Volume Shampoo

PFAS grade

Excellent 75/100

Overall grade

Good 63/100

Verdict

Buy

Hazard flags

⚑ 3

Material

aqueous shampoo liquid, standard cosmetic surfactants

Confidence

72%

PossibleFragrance allergens (undisclosed ingredients)

Possible1,4-dioxane contamination (shampoo surfactant byproduct)

PossibleScalp irritation from sulfate surfactants

Where these two actually differ

  • We flag Surfactant irritation (skin/eye contact), Fragrance allergens and Microbial contamination (post-purchase) on the Aveeno and not on the Bumble and bumble.
  • We flag Fragrance allergens (undisclosed ingredients), 1,4-dioxane contamination (shampoo surfactant byproduct) and Scalp irritation from sulfate surfactants on the Bumble and bumble and not on the Aveeno.
  • The Aveeno is aqueous liquid shampoo (typical surfactants, conditioning agents, water) where the Bumble and bumble is aqueous shampoo liquid, standard cosmetic surfactants, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
  • These two are level, close enough that price and fit should decide it rather than our grade.

Both products run through the same public rubric, which covers materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →

More shampoo, see the full ranking