PFAS75/ 100Excellent
Overall63/ 100Good
Bumble and Bumble Thickening Volume Shampoo

Bumble and bumble · Shampoo

Bumble and Bumble Thickening Volume Shampoo

Excellent

Low-medium concern; typical shampoo with no known PFAS triggers and no brand disclosure.

Verdict: BuyStandard aqueous shampoo with no established safety red flags; lower PFAS concern typical for category; brand disclosure limited but no known controversies.

This rinse-off liquid cosmetic has no inherent need for nonstick coatings, water repellency, or grease resistance that drive PFAS use. The brand publishes no PFAS claims, certifications, or lab data, and no recalls are documented.

Check price on Amazon →

We flunk more products than we pass. This one earned its grade. How we grade

Material

aqueous shampoo liquid, standard cosmetic surfactants

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

No PFAS disclosure

The company has not publicly discussed PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

cosmetics is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

80/ 100
🏷️

Fragrance allergens (undisclosed ingredients)

Bumble and Bumble products use proprietary fragrance blends listed as 'fragrance' or 'parfum' on labels, concealing specific allergen content under trade-secret rules. Individuals with fragrance sensitivity or documented reactions to cosmetic perfumes should request detailed fragrance breakdown or test on inner arm before use.

70/ 100
⚠️

1,4-dioxane contamination (shampoo surfactant byproduct)

Standard aqueous shampoos may contain trace 1,4-dioxane as an unintended byproduct of ethoxylated surfactants during manufacturing. No specific testing data public for this product; risk is typical for conventional shampoos, not unique to this brand or formulation.

70/ 100
⚠️

Scalp irritation from sulfate surfactants

If this product contains sodium lauryl sulfate or sodium laureth sulfate (common but not confirmed for this specific line), some users report scalp irritation with prolonged use. Check ingredient label; if sensitivity occurs, discontinue and switch to sulfate-free alternative.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

Safe base material

Made from ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber with no PFAS risk.

100/ 100
⛏️

Heavy metals

No recalls, regulatory actions, or credible reports of lead, cadmium, or arsenic contamination in Bumble and Bumble Thickening Volume Shampoo. Standard cosmetic ingredient limits apply and are enforced by FDA.

Source: FDA
95/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

No evidence this product uses formaldehyde releasers (e.g., DMDM hydantoin, diazolidinyl urea) based on available ingredient lists. Modern Estee Lauder formulations typically avoid these older preservative classes.

Source: ATSDR
95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Bumble and Bumble Thickening Volume Shampoo is a water-based liquid formulation using common anionic and amphoteric surfactants to cleanse and condition hair. The 'thickening' claim typically relies on polymers and conditioning agents rather than harmful additives. No reported use of restricted heavy metals, formaldehyde releasers, or known carcinogenic dyes in this product line based on available ingredient disclosures.

The brand's record and disclosure

Bumble and bumble (owned by Estee Lauder) does not publish comprehensive chemical transparency reports or third-party certifications like EWG Verified or Clean Beauty certifications. The brand has no documented recalls or substantive safety controversies on public record for this shampoo. Ingredient lists are available via retailer websites and the brand site, but proactive disclosure of supply-chain testing or heavy-metal screening is absent.

How it compares in its category

This product sits in the premium mass-market shampoo tier, positioned above drugstore formulations but without the third-party verification sought by clean-beauty brands. Most mainstream shampoos use similar surfactant chemistries; the main differentiator here is price and marketing rather than demonstrably safer formulation. No evidence this shampoo is safer or less safe than comparable high-end brands like Olaplex or Kerastase.

If you buy it

Store away from direct heat and sunlight to prevent fragrance volatilization and preserve emulsion stability. Use as directed (typically coin-sized amount); oversaturation does not improve thickening claims and wastes product. Replace every 6-9 months or when efficacy declines; unopened bottles shelf-stable for 2-3 years. No special dermatological concerns for typical scalp use, though anyone with documented fragrance sensitivity should patch-test or request full ingredient breakdown.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 72% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Bumble and bumble has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Safer alternatives in Shampoo

Roz Salt Scalp Scrub

Credo Beauty

Roz Salt Scalp Scrub

salt crystals, mineral-based scrub

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade86Excellent
🏷️

Fragrance allergens or undisclosed fragrance components

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Mechanical irritation from crystal size and shape

Moderate concern

45

Low risk, salt scrub formulation carries minimal PFAS concern.

Credo Beauty certification

Verified PFAS-free by a third party

Public Goods Shampoo Refill

Puracy

Public Goods Shampoo Refill

aqueous surfactant-based liquid shampoo

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade88Excellent
⚠️

1,4-dioxane (surfactant byproduct)

Limited concern

70
🏷️

Fragrance allergens (undisclosed components)

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Bacterial or mold growth in refill container

Limited concern

70

Lower concern for a MADE SAFE certified shampoo avoiding fluorinated ingredients.

MADE SAFE

Verified PFAS-free by a third party

Puracy Natural Shampoo

Puracy

Natural Shampoo

aqueous surfactants, plant-derived cleansers

PFAS Grade90Excellent
Overall Grade78Excellent
⚠️

1,4-dioxane (contaminant in ethoxylated surfactants)

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Fragrance allergens and sensitizers

Limited concern

70
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Limited concern

70

Lower concern for a liquid shampoo with minimal PFAS risk in this category.

Risky category by default

More shampoo grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.