Apple Cider Vinegar Shampoo vs Kin Organics Dog Shampoo: which is safer?
These two grade almost identically. Pick on price and preference; neither has a PFAS edge.
Aveeno
Apple Cider Vinegar Shampoo
PFAS grade
Overall grade
Verdict
Hazard flags
Material
Confidence
PossibleSurfactant irritation (skin/eye contact)
PossibleFragrance allergens
PossibleMicrobial contamination (post-purchase)
Kin+Kind
Kin Organics Dog Shampoo
PFAS grade
Overall grade
Verdict
Hazard flags
Material
Confidence
PossiblePreservative system efficacy and microbial risk
PossibleFragrance allergens and sensitization
Possible1,4-dioxane (synthetic surfactant impurity)
Where these two actually differ
- We flag Surfactant irritation (skin/eye contact), Fragrance allergens and Microbial contamination (post-purchase) on the Aveeno and not on the Kin+Kind.
- We flag Preservative system efficacy and microbial risk, Fragrance allergens and sensitization and 1,4-dioxane (synthetic surfactant impurity) on the Kin+Kind and not on the Aveeno.
- The Aveeno is aqueous liquid shampoo (typical surfactants, conditioning agents, water) where the Kin+Kind is aqueous liquid shampoo base; no reported fluoropolymers or DWR treatments, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
- These two are level, close enough that price and fit should decide it rather than our grade.
Both products run through the same public rubric, which covers materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →
More shampoo, see the full ranking