Apple Cider Vinegar Shampoo vs Pro-V Radiant Color Shine Shampoo: which is safer?

Aveeno Apple Cider Vinegar Shampoo is our pick, better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.

Our pick

Aveeno Apple Cider Vinegar Shampoo

Aveeno

Apple Cider Vinegar Shampoo

PFAS grade

Excellent 75/100

Overall grade

Good 63/100

Verdict

Buy

Hazard flags

⚑ 3

Material

aqueous liquid shampoo (typical surfactants, conditioning agents, water)

Confidence

82%

PossibleSurfactant irritation (skin/eye contact)

PossibleFragrance allergens

PossibleMicrobial contamination (post-purchase)

Pantene Pro-V Radiant Color Shine Shampoo

Pantene

Pro-V Radiant Color Shine Shampoo

PFAS grade

Excellent 75/100

Overall grade

Poor 39/100

Verdict

Buy with care

Hazard flags

⚑ 4

Material

Aqueous shampoo base with surfactants, silicones, and conditioning agents

Confidence

72%

Possible1,4-dioxane (residual from manufacturing)

ReportedFragrance allergen complexity

PossibleSilicone accumulation on hair and scalp

Where these two actually differ

  • We flag Surfactant irritation (skin/eye contact), Fragrance allergens and Microbial contamination (post-purchase) on the Aveeno and not on the Pantene.
  • We flag 1,4-dioxane (residual from manufacturing), Fragrance allergen complexity, Silicone accumulation on hair and scalp and Eye irritation from surfactants on the Pantene and not on the Aveeno.
  • The Aveeno is aqueous liquid shampoo (typical surfactants, conditioning agents, water) where the Pantene is Aqueous shampoo base with surfactants, silicones, and conditioning agents, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
  • These two are level, close enough that price and fit should decide it rather than our grade.

Both products run through the same public rubric, which covers materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →

More shampoo, see the full ranking