Incontinence Pads vs Because Booster Pads: which is safer?
Eco by Naty Incontinence Pads is our pick, better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.
Our pick
Eco By Naty
Incontinence Pads
PFAS grade
Good 70/100
Overall grade
Good 66/100
Verdict
Buy
Hazard flags
⚑ 1
Material
Bamboo-derived viscose, cotton, plant-based absorbent core
Confidence
78%
PossibleHeavy metals in cellulose or plant-derived materials
Because Market
Because Booster Pads
PFAS grade
Good 70/100
Overall grade
Good 62/100
Verdict
Buy
Hazard flags
⚑ 2
Material
Cellulose, superabsorbent polymer, cotton blend
Confidence
75%
PossibleAbsorbent material degradation and bacterial growth
PossibleSynthetic polymer microparticle shedding
Where these two actually differ
- We flag Heavy metals in cellulose or plant-derived materials on the Eco By Naty and not on the Because Market.
- We flag Absorbent material degradation and bacterial growth and Synthetic polymer microparticle shedding on the Because Market and not on the Eco By Naty.
- The Eco By Naty is Bamboo-derived viscose, cotton, plant-based absorbent core where the Because Market is Cellulose, superabsorbent polymer, cotton blend, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
- These two are level, close enough that price and fit should decide it rather than our grade.
Both products run through the same public rubric, which covers materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →
More incontinence pads & protection, see the full ranking