UltraCharge 3-in-1 Qi2 Foldable Magnetic Charger 25W vs 25W Super Fast Charging Wall Charger: which is safer?
These two grade almost identically. Pick on price and preference; neither has a PFAS edge.
Belkin
UltraCharge 3-in-1 Qi2 Foldable Magnetic Charger 25W
PFAS grade
Excellent 85/100
Overall grade
Excellent 77/100
Verdict
Buy
Hazard flags
⚑ 2
Material
Aluminum alloy, silicone, plastic, magnets
Confidence
72%
PossibleSilicone degradation under repeated stress
PossibleNeodymium magnet ingestion (secondary hazard)
Samsung
25W Super Fast Charging Wall Charger
PFAS grade
Excellent 85/100
Overall grade
Excellent 77/100
Verdict
Buy
Hazard flags
⚑ 2
Material
plastic housing, internal circuits, ceramic capacitors
Confidence
78%
PossibleElectrical/thermal safety (design integrity)
PossibleManufacturing contamination or counterfeit units
Where these two actually differ
- We flag Silicone degradation under repeated stress and Neodymium magnet ingestion (secondary hazard) on the Belkin and not on the Samsung.
- We flag Electrical/thermal safety (design integrity) and Manufacturing contamination or counterfeit units on the Samsung and not on the Belkin.
- The Belkin is Aluminum alloy, silicone, plastic, magnets where the Samsung is plastic housing, internal circuits, ceramic capacitors, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
- These two are level, close enough that price and fit should decide it rather than our grade.
Both products run through the same public rubric, which covers materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →
More waterproof phone chargers & cables, see the full ranking