Suede Splash Lipstick vs Hot Lips Lipstick: which is safer?

Burt's Bees Suede Splash Lipstick is our pick, better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.

Our pick

Burt's Bees Suede Splash Lipstick

Burt's Bees

Suede Splash Lipstick

PFAS grade

Excellent 75/100

Overall grade

Good 67/100

Verdict

Buy

Hazard flags

⚑ 2

Material

Wax, oils, pigments, beeswax base

Confidence

78%

PossibleFragrance allergens (essential oils, fragrance compounds)

PossibleOil rancidity and skin irritation over time

Charlotte Tilbury Hot Lips Lipstick

Charlotte Tilbury

Hot Lips Lipstick

PFAS grade

Excellent 75/100

Overall grade

Good 63/100

Verdict

Buy

Hazard flags

⚑ 3

Material

Wax, oils, pigments, and traditional cosmetic binders

Confidence

78%

PossibleHeavy metals in pigments (lead, cadmium, arsenic)

PossibleFragrance allergens

PossibleOil oxidation and rancidity over time

Where these two actually differ

  • We flag Fragrance allergens (essential oils, fragrance compounds) and Oil rancidity and skin irritation over time on the Burt's Bees and not on the Charlotte Tilbury.
  • We flag Heavy metals in pigments (lead, cadmium, arsenic), Fragrance allergens and Oil oxidation and rancidity over time on the Charlotte Tilbury and not on the Burt's Bees.
  • The Burt's Bees is Wax, oils, pigments, beeswax base where the Charlotte Tilbury is Wax, oils, pigments, and traditional cosmetic binders, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
  • These two are level, close enough that price and fit should decide it rather than our grade.

Both products run through the same public rubric, which covers materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →

More lipstick, see the full ranking