Sun Ridge Sleeping Bag vs Fitz Roy Down Sleeping Bag: which is safer?

Patagonia Fitz Roy Down Sleeping Bag is our pick, better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.

Coleman Sun Ridge Sleeping Bag

Coleman

Sun Ridge Sleeping Bag

PFAS grade

Bad 20/100

Overall grade

Bad 12/100

Verdict

Skip

Hazard flags

⚑ 2

Material

polyester with water-repellent coating water-repellent finish

Confidence

35%

Possiblewater-repellent coating finish chemistry (PFAS-status unknown)

PossibleMicrofiber shedding from polyester

Our pick

Patagonia Fitz Roy Down Sleeping Bag

Patagonia

Fitz Roy Down Sleeping Bag

PFAS grade

Poor 45/100

Overall grade

Poor 37/100

Verdict

Skip

Hazard flags

⚑ 2

Material

Down fill + nylon or polyester shell with water-repellent coating treatment

Confidence

62%

Possiblewater-repellent coating treatment chemistry (PFAS status unverified)

PossibleMicroplastic shedding from shell abrasion

Where these two actually differ

  • We flag DWR finish chemistry (PFAS-status unknown) and Microfiber shedding from polyester on the Coleman and not on the Patagonia.
  • We flag DWR treatment chemistry (PFAS status unverified) and Microplastic shedding from shell abrasion on the Patagonia and not on the Coleman.
  • The Coleman is polyester with DWR water-repellent finish where the Patagonia is Down fill + nylon or polyester shell with DWR treatment, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
  • The gap is 25 points, wide enough that this is not a close call, and the Patagonia is the one to buy.
  • We are less certain about the Coleman grade, at 35% confidence against 62%, because it discloses less.

Both products run through the same public rubric, which covers materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →

More sleeping bags, see the full ranking