Men's Silver Ridge Convertible Pants vs Men's Stealth Spring Chino Pants: which is safer?
Columbia Men's Stealth Spring Chino Pants is our pick, better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.
Columbia
Men's Silver Ridge Convertible Pants
PFAS grade
Bad 20/100
Overall grade
Bad 0/100
Verdict
Skip
Hazard flags
⚑ 2
Material
nylon/polyester blend with water-repellent coating treatment
Confidence
62%
Likelywater-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) finish durability and degradation
PossibleMicroplastic shedding from synthetic fibers during washing
Our pick
Columbia
Men's Stealth Spring Chino Pants
PFAS grade
Good 65/100
Overall grade
Good 59/100
Verdict
Skip
Hazard flags
⚑ 1
Material
cotton-blend chino twill (no water-repellent treatment noted)
Confidence
72%
PossibleAzo dyes (synthetic colorants)
Where these two actually differ
- We flag DWR (durable water-repellent) finish durability and degradation and Microplastic shedding from synthetic fibers during washing on the Columbia and not on the Columbia.
- We flag Azo dyes (synthetic colorants) on the Columbia and not on the Columbia.
- The Columbia is nylon/polyester blend with DWR treatment where the Columbia is cotton-blend chino twill (no water-repellent treatment noted), which is most of the difference in these two grades.
- The gap is 45 points, wide enough that this is not a close call, and the Columbia is the one to buy.
Both products run through the same public rubric, which covers materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →
More hiking pants, see the full ranking