Men's Stealth Spring Chino Pants vs Men's Terravia Trail Pants: which is safer?
Columbia Men's Stealth Spring Chino Pants is our pick, better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.
Our pick
Columbia
Men's Stealth Spring Chino Pants
PFAS grade
Good 65/100
Overall grade
Good 59/100
Verdict
Skip
Hazard flags
⚑ 1
Material
cotton-blend chino twill (no water-repellent treatment noted)
Confidence
72%
PossibleAzo dyes (synthetic colorants)
Patagonia
Men's Terravia Trail Pants
PFAS grade
Poor 45/100
Overall grade
Poor 31/100
Verdict
Skip
Hazard flags
⚑ 2
Material
nylon/polyester blend with water-repellent coating treatment
Confidence
62%
PossiblePFAS in water-repellent coating treatment
Reportedwater-repellent coating degradation and microfiber shedding
Where these two actually differ
- We flag Azo dyes (synthetic colorants) on the Columbia and not on the Patagonia.
- We flag PFAS in DWR treatment and DWR coating degradation and microfiber shedding on the Patagonia and not on the Columbia.
- The Columbia is cotton-blend chino twill (no water-repellent treatment noted) where the Patagonia is nylon/polyester blend with DWR treatment, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
Both products run through the same public rubric, which covers materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →
More hiking pants, see the full ranking