8 3-Compartment Hinged Containers vs Compostable Food Storage Container 5ct: which is safer?

Matter Compostable Food Storage Container 5ct is the clear pick. 8 3-Compartment Hinged Containers carries a failing PFAS grade, and we never recommend buying a failing product.

8 3-Compartment Hinged Containers

8 3-Compartment Hinged Containers

PFAS grade

Poor 25/100

Overall grade

Bad 0/100

Verdict

Skip

Hazard flags

⚑ 4

Material

Polypropylene (PP) hinged container, likely grease-resistant coating

Confidence

42%

LikelyFluorinated coating compounds (undisclosed)

PossiblePolymer leaching under heat or acid

PossibleCoating wear and consumption

Our pick

Matter Compostable Food Storage Container 5ct

Matter

Compostable Food Storage Container 5ct

PFAS grade

Excellent 100/100

Overall grade

Excellent 92/100

Verdict

Buy

Hazard flags

⚑ 2

Material

Plant-based fiber pulp (compostable)

Confidence

82%

PossibleMicrobe/mold growth if stored damp

PossibleCellulose degradation under repeated hot/wet stress

Where these two actually differ

  • We flag Fluorinated coating compounds (undisclosed), Polymer leaching under heat or acid, Coating wear and consumption and Microplastic generation during use on the and not on the Matter.
  • We flag Microbe/mold growth if stored damp and Cellulose degradation under repeated hot/wet stress on the Matter and not on the .
  • The is Polypropylene (PP) hinged container, likely grease-resistant coating where the Matter is Plant-based fiber pulp (compostable), which is most of the difference in these two grades.
  • The gap is 75 points, wide enough that this is not a close call, and the Matter is the one to buy.
  • We are less certain about the grade, at 42% confidence against 82%, because it discloses less.

Both products run through the same public rubric, which covers materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →

More food packaging, see the full ranking