PFAS25/ 100Poor
Overall0/ 100Bad
8 3-Compartment Hinged Containers

Compose · Food Packaging

8 3-Compartment Hinged Containers

Poor

Avoid until the brand discloses what chemicals make it grease-resistant.

Verdict: SkipPolypropylene base is low-toxicity, but undisclosed grease-resistant coating and brand silence on PFAS warrant cautious use and regular replacement.

These polypropylene containers likely have grease-resistant coatings, a typical application for PFAS treatments. The brand offers no public PFAS information or certifications, making the risk difficult to assess.

The safe swap

World Centric Compostable Fiber Compost-A-Pak Containers

World Centric

World Centric Compostable Fiber Compost-A-Pak Containers

100/100 safety

100Excellent

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Polypropylene (PP) hinged container, likely grease-resistant coating

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent treatments have historically contained PFAS chemicals.

65/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

The company has not publicly discussed PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

food packaging is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

75/ 100
🏷️

Fluorinated coating compounds (undisclosed)

Grease-resistant coatings on food-contact PP are typically fluorinated (PFOA, PFOS, or GenX-class alternatives). Compose's silence on which chemicals are used prevents risk assessment. Even 'short-chain' PFAS alternatives persist in the environment and bioaccumulate.

20/ 100
⛏️

Polymer leaching under heat or acid

Polypropylene can leach oligomers and residual monomers if exposed to microwave heat, fatty foods, or acidic liquids. The grease-resistant coating may also degrade and release breakdown products under these conditions, though no specific recalls for Compose containers are on record.

70/ 100

Coating wear and consumption

With repeated washing, stacking, and use, the fluorinated or polymeric coating can peel or fragment. Ingestion of coating particles is unlikely to cause acute harm but underscores the importance of replacing worn containers.

70/ 100
🫧

Microplastic generation during use

Any plastic container can shed microparticles through mechanical wear. The scale and composition of shedding from these hinged containers is not quantified in published studies, but disposal and reuse amplify the problem.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

🍼

BPA & bisphenols

Modern PP manufacturing in developed countries typically avoids BPA; antimony (used as a polymerization catalyst) can migrate in trace amounts but is not flagged as a concern for polypropylene food contact in FDA or EU guidance.

Source: FDA
95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

These are polypropylene (PP, #5 plastic) hinged clamshell containers, a food-contact material generally considered lower-hazard than #6 PS or #7 polycarbonate. Polypropylene itself has no known endocrine disruptors or primary carcinogens at normal use temperatures. However, the grease-resistant coating applied to the interior is the critical unknown: manufacturers typically use fluorinated compounds to repel oils and moisture, and Compose has made no public disclosure of which chemicals achieve this, creating opacity around potential PFAS or other fluorinated alternatives of unclear safety.

The brand's record and disclosure

Compose (a Huhtamaki subsidiary) has not published transparent ingredient disclosures or PFAS safety statements in publicly available materials reviewed here. The brand offers no third-party certifications (e.g., GreenGuard, FDA pre-approval testing) that would reduce this opacity. This silence is noteworthy because major competitors (e.g., Footprint, World Centric) have begun voluntarily disclosing fluorine-free or PFAS-free claims in response to regulatory and consumer pressure. Compose's lack of such positioning suggests either the coatings are conventional (fluorinated) or the brand has not prioritized transparency.

How it compares in its category

Hinged PP containers dominate foodservice globally and are generally safer than foam or coated paperboard for heat/moisture resistance. However, comparison depends on coating choice: brands using silicone or wax-based water barriers (instead of fluorinated coatings) exist but are less common. Compose's product lacks certification or public testing data that would distinguish it from mid-range offerings; premium alternatives (e.g., World Centric's compostable containers) come with explicit PFAS-free or recycled-content claims, while budget competitors often match Compose's silence.

If you buy it

Use for cold or warm foods only; polypropylene begins softening above 160F and can leach additives if regularly microwaved or filled with hot oils. Do not store acidic foods (vinegar, citrus, tomato) for extended periods, as acids can degrade polymers and coatings. Replace containers after heavy or prolonged use, especially if the interior coating shows wear or cloudiness. Wash by hand (avoid dishwasher heat) and inspect regularly for cracks, discoloration, or grease that won't rinse off, all signs of coating breakdown.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 42% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Compose has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Safer alternatives in Food Packaging

World Centric Compostable Fiber Compost-A-Pak Containers

World Centric

Compostable Fiber Compost-A-Pak Containers

Fiber-based (wood pulp/molded fiber), compostable coating

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade74Good
🍳

Proprietary coating chemical migration

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Moisture and microbial growth in fiber matrix

Limited concern

70

Coating degradation under heat or fatty foods

Moderate concern

45
⚠️

Recycling contamination if misdisposed

Limited concern

70

Lower concern with documented PFAS-free commitments, though independent lab confirmation on this specific product absent.

Compostable (BPI/ASTM D6868 or equivalent)Certified compostable foodware (third-party verified)

Verified PFAS-free by a third party

Vegware Compostable Microflute Takeaway Box

Vegware

Compostable Microflute Takeaway Box

Plant-based fiber (sugarcane bagasse microflute); water-based coatings

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade96Excellent

Coating degradation under heat and moisture

Limited concern

70

Lower concern; plant-based compostable packaging with stated PFAS-free positioning and limited independent verification.

OK Compost Home (EN 13432)OK Compost Industrial (EN 13432)Independently tested for PFAS-free status

Verified PFAS-free by a third party

Compostable Hinged Deli Containers

Loliware

Compostable Hinged Deli Containers

Polylactic acid (PLA) bioplastic, plant-based coatings

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade92Excellent
⛏️

PLA oligomer leaching

Limited concern

70
🫧

Microplastic generation on degradation

Limited concern

70

Lower PFAS concern; compostable bioplastic design avoids fluorine coatings.

BPI Certified CompostableMADE SAFE Certified

Verified PFAS-free by a third party

More food packaging grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.