Chef's Classic Anodized Aluminum Skillet vs Rio Ceramic Nonstick Frypan: which is safer?

GreenPan Rio Ceramic Nonstick Frypan edges it on pure PFAS risk, but Cuisinart Chef's Classic Anodized Aluminum Skillet wins overall once other hazards are counted.

Our pick

Cuisinart Chef's Classic Anodized Aluminum Skillet

Cuisinart

Chef's Classic Anodized Aluminum Skillet

PFAS grade

Good 65/100

Overall grade

Good 59/100

Verdict

Skip

Hazard flags

⚑ 1

Material

anodized aluminum (hard-coat anodic oxidation)

Confidence

78%

PossibleCoating degradation and leachables from breakdown

GreenPan Rio Ceramic Nonstick Frypan

GreenPan

Rio Ceramic Nonstick Frypan

PFAS grade

Good 70/100

Overall grade

Good 58/100

Verdict

Buy

Hazard flags

⚑ 3

Material

ceramic nonstick coating

Confidence

82%

PossibleCoating degradation and particulate release

PossibleAluminum leaching from base metal

PossibleThermal polymer decomposition fumes

Where these two actually differ

  • We flag Coating degradation and leachables from breakdown on the Cuisinart and not on the GreenPan.
  • We flag Coating degradation and particulate release, Aluminum leaching from base metal and Thermal polymer decomposition fumes on the GreenPan and not on the Cuisinart.
  • The Cuisinart is anodized aluminum (hard-coat anodic oxidation) where the GreenPan is ceramic nonstick coating, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
  • These two are 5 points apart, close enough that price and fit should decide it rather than our grade.

Both products run through the same public rubric, which covers materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →

More nonstick skillets, see the full ranking