lunchbox/BentoBox 1.2 litres, 3 inserts | Catering at very favourable prices vs Double Wall Vacuum Insulated Stainless Steel Food Canister Container with Leak Proof Lid: which is safer?
Klean Kanteen Double Wall Vacuum Insulated Stainless Steel Food Canister Container with Leak Proof Lid is our pick, better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.
Emsa
lunchbox/BentoBox 1.2 litres, 3 inserts | Catering at very favourable prices
PFAS grade
Overall grade
Verdict
Hazard flags
Material
Confidence
PossibleMicroplastics from degradation
PossibleBacterial growth in seals and crevices
ReportedThermal warping and seal failure
Our pick
Klean Kanteen
Double Wall Vacuum Insulated Stainless Steel Food Canister Container with Leak Proof Lid
PFAS grade
Overall grade
Verdict
Hazard flags
Material
Confidence
PossibleSilicone gasket degradation
PossibleBacterial growth in vacuum seal
PossibleSurface corrosion under acidic conditions
Where these two actually differ
- We flag Microplastics from degradation, Bacterial growth in seals and crevices and Thermal warping and seal failure on the Emsa and not on the Klean Kanteen.
- We flag Silicone gasket degradation, Bacterial growth in vacuum seal and Surface corrosion under acidic conditions on the Klean Kanteen and not on the Emsa.
- The Emsa is Plastic (likely polypropylene or polyethylene) where the Klean Kanteen is Stainless steel body, silicone gasket lid seal, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
- The gap is 30 points, wide enough that this is not a close call, and the Klean Kanteen is the one to buy.
Both products run through the same public rubric, which covers materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →
More lunch boxes, see the full ranking