Functional Form Cutting Board Set, 3-Piece vs Wonder Mat: which is safer?

Functional Form Cutting Board Set, 3-Piece is the clear pick. Tupperware Wonder Mat carries a failing PFAS grade, and we never recommend buying a failing product.

Our pick

Fiskars

Functional Form Cutting Board Set, 3-Piece

PFAS grade

Excellent 85/100

Overall grade

Good 63/100

Verdict

Buy

Hazard flags

⚑ 4

Material

Polypropylene or similar plastic; no nonstick or waterproof coating disclosed

Confidence

72%

PossibleMicroplastic shedding from cutting action

ReportedBacterial biofilm accumulation in deep cuts

PossibleStaining and odor retention

Tupperware Wonder Mat

Tupperware

Wonder Mat

PFAS grade

Good 65/100

Overall grade

Poor 49/100

Verdict

Skip

Hazard flags

⚑ 4

Material

Silicone baking mat

Confidence

42%

PossibleSilicone oligomer leaching

PossibleThermal degradation and breakdown

PossibleMicroparticle shedding from wear

Where these two actually differ

  • We flag Microplastic shedding from cutting action, Bacterial biofilm accumulation in deep cuts, Staining and odor retention and Heat-induced warping or leaching on the Fiskars and not on the Tupperware.
  • We flag Silicone oligomer leaching, Thermal degradation and breakdown, Microparticle shedding from wear and Bacterial biofilm if not dried thoroughly on the Tupperware and not on the Fiskars.
  • The Fiskars is Polypropylene or similar plastic; no nonstick or waterproof coating disclosed where the Tupperware is Silicone baking mat, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
  • We are less certain about the Tupperware grade, at 42% confidence against 72%, because it discloses less.

Both products run through the same public rubric, which covers materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →

More silicone cutting & prep boards, see the full ranking