PFAS15/ 100Bad
Overall0/ 100Bad
Tupperware Wonder Mat

Pyrex · Silicone Cutting Mats & Prep Boards

Tupperware Wonder Mat

Bad

Nonstick coating not disclosed; no public PFAS safety data.

Verdict: SkipSilicone mat with undisclosed nonstick coating poses unknown PFAS risk; use cautiously, avoid high heat, replace if degraded.

Silicone baking mat with unknown nonstick properties and no PFAS transparency from the brand. Composition details remain unclear to consumers.

The safe swap

Silikomart Silicone Grip Mat

Silikomart

Silikomart Silicone Grip Mat

80/100 safety

80Excellent

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Silicone baking mat, unspecified nonstick coating

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Non-stick, chemistry undisclosed

Advertised as non-stick but coating type is not explained.

60/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

PFAS exposure happens more often with clothing products.

70/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

The company has not publicly discussed PFAS in this product.

85/ 100

Nonstick coating degradation and leaching

The undisclosed nonstick formulation may leach into food if the coating chips, cracks, or degrades with age or heat exposure. No public testing of this specific product is available; risk depends on whether the coating contains Teflon-type coating or other reactive compounds.

70/ 100
🍂

Heat-induced coating failure and flaking

Silicone baking mats in general are known to degrade at temperatures above 400-450°F; flaking or peeling has been reported by users on cookware forums, increasing contamination risk if fragments enter food.

45/ 100
🍳

Unverified nonstick formulation safety

Without disclosure of the coating's chemistry or third-party certification (FDA approval alone does not guarantee PFAS absence), the specific chemical composition remains a black box for the consumer.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

Silicone filler and additive migration

Food-grade silicone itself is considered low-risk, but some bulk silicone formulations contain trace plasticizers or vulcanization residues. No reported issues with Pyrex silicone mats exist in public records.

95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

This product is a silicone baking mat with an unspecified nonstick coating applied to the surface. Silicone itself is considered inert and heat-stable, but the nonstick layer's chemistry is not publicly disclosed by the brand, making it impossible to rule out Teflon-type coating or other fluorinated compounds. The mat's performance depends entirely on the durability and stability of that coating; if it degrades or flakes, both the mat's functionality and potential contaminant release become concerns.

The brand's record and disclosure

Pyrex is owned by Instant Brands and has a mixed history on transparency regarding cookware coatings. The company has not published detailed material safety data or PFAS testing results for this specific mat. No major recalls or public health actions specific to Tupperware Wonder Mat silicone mats are on record, but the lack of disclosure around the nonstick formulation is itself a red flag for informed purchasing. Pyrex has faced scrutiny in recent years over glass cookware durability but has not proactively addressed PFAS concerns in non-glass product lines.

How it compares in its category

Silicone baking mats occupy a middle ground: they avoid the Teflon-type coating and potential PFOA concerns of traditional Teflon cookware but depend on the coating vendor's formulation integrity. Many premium silicone mat makers (e.g., Artisan, OXO) publish material certifications; Pyrex's silence on coating specifics makes this product less transparent than category leaders. Uncoated parchment paper and bare glass or cast iron remain the lowest-risk alternatives if PFAS avoidance is a priority.

If you buy it

Keep the mat below 400-450°F; sustained high heat can degrade silicone coatings and accelerate any leaching. Inspect regularly for visible wear, flaking, discoloration, or peeling; replace immediately if the surface is compromised. Hand-wash gently and avoid abrasive scrubbers and scouring pads, which can strip the nonstick layer. Do not use under broilers or direct flame, and store flat in a cool, dry place to extend coating life.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 42% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Pyrex has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Safer alternatives in Silicone Cutting Mats & Prep Boards

Silikomart Silicone Grip Mat

Silikomart

Silicone Grip Mat

silicone rubber grip mat, non-coated

PFAS Grade80Excellent
Overall Grade68Good
⛏️

Siloxane leaching (low-molecular-weight oligomers)

Limited concern

70
🫧

Microparticle shedding from grip surface

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Mold or bacterial growth in surface texture

Limited concern

70

Low concern; silicone grip mats rarely contain PFAS.

Risky category by default

Rockler Silicone Project Mat

Pyrex

Rockler Silicone Project Mat

silicone

PFAS Grade80Excellent
Overall Grade72Good
⚠️

Bacterial or mold growth if unmaintained

Limited concern

70
🏭

Migration of manufacturing residue or plasticizers

Limited concern

70

Silicone project mat carries low concern; no coating risk.

Risky category by default

SILPAT 11 7/8" x 16 1/2" Half-Size Silicone Non-Stick Baking Mat

Silpat

11 7/8" x 16 1/2" Half-Size Silicone Non-Stick Baking Mat

silicone non-stick baking mat

PFAS Grade65Good
Overall Grade53Good
🫧

Silicone degradation and microparticle shedding

Limited concern

70
🍳

Fiberglass mesh exposure if coating damaged

Limited concern

70
🎨

Color dyes or pigments in non-white variants

Limited concern

70

Low concern, typical silicone mat; brand remains silent on ingredients.

Risky category by default

More silicone cutting mats & prep boards grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.