Compostable Food Storage Container 5ct vs Coco Wooden Square Takeout Bento Box: which is safer?

Matter Compostable Food Storage Container 5ct is our pick, better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.

Our pick

Matter Compostable Food Storage Container 5ct

Matter

Compostable Food Storage Container 5ct

PFAS grade

Excellent 100/100

Overall grade

Excellent 92/100

Verdict

Buy

Hazard flags

⚑ 2

Material

Plant-based fiber pulp (compostable)

Confidence

82%

PossibleMicrobe/mold growth if stored damp

PossibleCellulose degradation under repeated hot/wet stress

Coco Wooden Square Takeout Bento Box

Coco Wooden Square Takeout Bento Box

PFAS grade

Good 70/100

Overall grade

Poor 48/100

Verdict

Buy

Hazard flags

⚑ 4

Material

Wood (likely bamboo or hardwood composite)

Confidence

78%

PossibleAdhesive and binder off-gassing (formaldehyde/VOCs from composite)

PossibleSurface finish composition undisclosed

ReportedWood degradation and splinter/crack formation

Where these two actually differ

  • We flag Microbe/mold growth if stored damp and Cellulose degradation under repeated hot/wet stress on the Matter and not on the .
  • We flag Adhesive and binder off-gassing (formaldehyde/VOCs from composite), Surface finish composition undisclosed, Wood degradation and splinter/crack formation and Microbial growth if not dried properly on the and not on the Matter.
  • The Matter is Plant-based fiber pulp (compostable) where the is Wood (likely bamboo or hardwood composite), which is most of the difference in these two grades.
  • The gap is 30 points, wide enough that this is not a close call, and the Matter is the one to buy.

Both products run through the same public rubric, which covers materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →

More food packaging, see the full ranking