Rapha Men's Pro Team GORE-TEX Cycling Rain Jacket vs Women's Dirt Roamer Storm Jacket: which is safer?
Patagonia Women's Dirt Roamer Storm Jacket is our pick, better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.
Gore
Rapha Men's Pro Team GORE-TEX Cycling Rain Jacket
PFAS grade
Overall grade
Verdict
Hazard flags
Material
Confidence
LikelyTeflon-type coating membrane integrity and environmental release
PossibleFluorocarbon water-repellent coating finish durability and reapplication toxicity
PossiblePolyester degradation and synthetic fiber shedding
Our pick
Patagonia
Women's Dirt Roamer Storm Jacket
PFAS grade
Overall grade
Verdict
Hazard flags
Material
Confidence
PossibleAzo dyes and color fastness
PossibleAntimony in polyester fiber
Reportedwater-repellent coating degradation and re-treatment chemicals
Where these two actually differ
- We flag PTFE membrane integrity and environmental release, Fluorocarbon DWR finish durability and reapplication toxicity and Polyester degradation and synthetic fiber shedding on the Gore and not on the Patagonia.
- We flag Azo dyes and color fastness, Antimony in polyester fiber, DWR coating degradation and re-treatment chemicals and Unverified DWR chemistry on the Patagonia and not on the Gore.
- The Gore is GORE-TEX polytetrafluoroethylene membrane with DWR finish where the Patagonia is polyester shell with DWR finish, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
- The gap is 25 points, wide enough that this is not a close call, and the Patagonia is the one to buy.
- We are less certain about the Gore grade, at 45% confidence against 72%, because it discloses less.
Both products run through the same public rubric, which covers materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →
More cycling rain jackets, see the full ranking