PFAS20/ 100Bad
Overall0/ 100Bad
Rapha Men's Pro Team GORE-TEX Cycling Rain Jacket

Gore · Cycling Rain Jackets

Rapha Men's Pro Team GORE-TEX Cycling Rain Jacket

Bad

GORE-TEX contains Teflon-type coating; Gore makes no PFAS disclosure for this jacket.

Verdict: SkipHigh-performance cycling jacket with established PFAS concern (GORE-TEX membrane); other textile hazards low-risk. Buy if aware of PFAS trade-off; use responsibly and replace when worn.

GORE-TEX waterproof membranes rely on Teflon-type coating, a Teflon-family coating with PFAS concerns. Gore provides no public PFAS transparency or commitment for this product line.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

GORE-TEX polytetrafluoroethylene membrane with water-repellent coating finish

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

65/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

clothing is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

70/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Teflon-type coating membrane integrity and environmental release

GORE-TEX membranes shed Teflon-type coating microparticles during wear, washing, and weathering. While inhalation risk during normal use is low, cumulative microparticle shedding during laundry and eventual disposal poses aquatic and soil contamination concerns that Gore does not quantify or mitigate publicly.

20/ 100
♾️

Fluorocarbon water-repellent coating finish durability and reapplication toxicity

The outer-layer water-repellent coating finish degrades over 2-5 years and requires professional reapplication with commercial fluorocarbon sprays, which involve solvent inhalation and secondary PFAS exposure in consumer hands or dry-cleaning facilities. No PFAS-free water-repellent coating alternative is widely available for high-performance cycling.

70/ 100
🫧

Polyester degradation and synthetic fiber shedding

The polyester shell and fleece lining shed microplastics during washing and normal wear. This is a minor concern relative to Teflon-type coating, but tumble drying accelerates degradation; air-drying reduces microfiber release by approximately 50% per peer-reviewed laundry studies.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

⛏️

Heavy metals

No recalls or public testing data associate Rapha or Gore with banned azo dyes or heavy-metal contamination in their polyester components. Rapha's supply chain is not independently certified (e.g., STANDARD 100 by OEKO-TEX) for this product line.

Source: FDA
95/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Modern GORE-TEX production does not rely on formaldehyde-resin finishes, though no publicly available documentation confirms formaldehyde-free certification for this specific Rapha model.

Source: ATSDR
95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

This jacket uses GORE-TEX, a microporous Teflon-type coating (polytetrafluoroethylene) membrane bonded to polyester outer shell and fleece lining. The membrane's water-blocking properties depend on Teflon-type coating chemistry, which inherently involves fluorinated compounds (PFAS). The water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) finish on the outer fabric typically contains additional fluorocarbons to shed liquid and resist staining, compounding PFAS exposure pathways during manufacturing and disposal.

The brand's record and disclosure

Gore maintains no published disclosure policy on PFAS content in GORE-TEX products or water-repellent coating treatments. The company has not signed the ZDHC Gateway commitment or similar PFAS restriction agreements. Gore's technical marketing emphasizes durability and water resistance but is silent on chemical composition details or fluorine-free alternatives for cyclists. This opacity is a known industry pattern for membrane-technology leaders.

How it compares in its category

GORE-TEX jackets command premium prices partly because the Teflon-type coating membrane remains the most breathable waterproof option available at this performance level. Most competing cycling rain jackets use similar fluorocarbon-based membranes (eVent, Helly Tech, etc.) or cheaper polyurethane coatings, which avoid PFAS but sacrifice breathability. Fully PFAS-free waxed-cotton or microfiber alternatives exist but offer lower packability and durability typical of pro racing gear.

If you buy it

Wash separately in cold water with minimal detergent to reduce PFAS mobilization; avoid hot water and tumble drying, which can accelerate polymer breakdown. Inspect seams and coatings annually for delamination or peeling; replace once water beads stop forming reliably or seams leak, typically after 2-5 years of heavy use. Do not incinerate at end-of-life; check local textile recycling programs that handle technical fabrics separately from general waste.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 45% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Gore has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Safer alternatives in Cycling Rain Jackets

Mens Balance Made In Usa Cycling Jacket Windbreaker Water Resistant

Mens Balance Made In Usa Cycling Jacket Windbreaker Water Resistant

Synthetic fabric with water-resistant water-repellent coating, unspecified

PFAS Grade25Poor
Overall Grade17Bad
♾️

PFAS

Limited concern

70
🫧

Microplastic shedding from synthetic fabric

Limited concern

70

Skip until New Balance discloses water-repellent coating treatment details.

Waterproof or stain-proof treatment

More cycling rain jackets grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.