260 Tech Glove Liner vs Better Sweater Gloves Patagonia Women's: which is safer?
Better Sweater Gloves Patagonia Women's is the clear pick. Icebreaker 260 Tech Glove Liner carries a failing PFAS grade, and we never recommend buying a failing product.
Icebreaker
260 Tech Glove Liner
PFAS grade
Overall grade
Verdict
Hazard flags
Material
Confidence
PossibleAzo dyes in polyester base
PossibleFormaldehyde-releasing resins in finishing
PossiblePilling and microfiber shedding
Our pick
Patagonia
Better Sweater Gloves Patagonia Women's
PFAS grade
Overall grade
Verdict
Hazard flags
Material
Confidence
PossibleAzo dyes and heavy metal pigments
PossibleMicroplastic shedding during wash
Where these two actually differ
- We flag Azo dyes in polyester base, Formaldehyde-releasing resins in finishing, Pilling and microfiber shedding and Allergen risk from wool and dyes on the Icebreaker and not on the Patagonia.
- We flag Azo dyes and heavy metal pigments and Microplastic shedding during wash on the Patagonia and not on the Icebreaker.
- The Icebreaker is Merino wool blend, likely polyester base where the Patagonia is Polyester fleece (recycled), which is most of the difference in these two grades.
- The gap is 25 points, wide enough that this is not a close call, and the Patagonia is the one to buy.
Both products run through the same public rubric: materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →
More waterproof winter gloves: see the full ranking