unisex sierra gloves - BLACK xl vs Better Sweater Gloves Patagonia Women's: which is safer?

Better Sweater Gloves Patagonia Women's is the clear pick. Icebreaker unisex sierra gloves - BLACK xl carries a failing PFAS grade, and we never recommend buying a failing product.

Icebreaker unisex sierra gloves - BLACK xl

Icebreaker

unisex sierra gloves - BLACK xl

PFAS grade

Bad 20/100

Overall grade

Bad 8/100

Verdict

Skip

Hazard flags

⚑ 3

Material

merino wool blend with water-repellent coating water-repellent finish

Confidence

62%

PossiblePFAS in water-repellent coating finish

PossibleSynthetic fiber blend contaminants

Possiblewater-repellent coating finish degradation and microparticle shedding

Our pick

Better Sweater Gloves Patagonia Women's

Patagonia

Better Sweater Gloves Patagonia Women's

PFAS grade

Excellent 90/100

Overall grade

Excellent 82/100

Verdict

Buy

Hazard flags

⚑ 2

Material

Polyester fleece (recycled)

Confidence

72%

PossibleAzo dyes and heavy metal pigments

PossibleMicroplastic shedding during wash

Where these two actually differ

  • We flag PFAS in DWR finish, Synthetic fiber blend contaminants and DWR finish degradation and microparticle shedding on the Icebreaker and not on the Patagonia.
  • We flag Azo dyes and heavy metal pigments and Microplastic shedding during wash on the Patagonia and not on the Icebreaker.
  • The Icebreaker is merino wool blend with DWR water-repellent finish where the Patagonia is Polyester fleece (recycled), which is most of the difference in these two grades.
  • The gap is 70 points, wide enough that this is not a close call, and the Patagonia is the one to buy.

Both products run through the same public rubric: materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →

More waterproof winter gloves: see the full ranking