Women's Highloft Gloves vs Better Sweater Gloves Patagonia Women's: which is safer?

Better Sweater Gloves Patagonia Women's is the clear pick. Jack Wolfskin Women's Highloft Gloves carries a failing PFAS grade, and we never recommend buying a failing product.

Jack Wolfskin Women's Highloft Gloves

Jack Wolfskin

Women's Highloft Gloves

PFAS grade

Bad 20/100

Overall grade

Bad 12/100

Verdict

Skip

Hazard flags

⚑ 2

Material

Synthetic outer shell with water-repellent coating (unspecified type)

Confidence

42%

Possiblewater-repellent coating degradation and leaching

PossibleHeat sensitivity of synthetic shell and coating

Our pick

Better Sweater Gloves Patagonia Women's

Patagonia

Better Sweater Gloves Patagonia Women's

PFAS grade

Excellent 90/100

Overall grade

Excellent 82/100

Verdict

Buy

Hazard flags

⚑ 2

Material

Polyester fleece (recycled)

Confidence

72%

PossibleAzo dyes and heavy metal pigments

PossibleMicroplastic shedding during wash

Where these two actually differ

  • We flag DWR coating degradation and leaching and Heat sensitivity of synthetic shell and coating on the Jack Wolfskin and not on the Patagonia.
  • We flag Azo dyes and heavy metal pigments and Microplastic shedding during wash on the Patagonia and not on the Jack Wolfskin.
  • The Jack Wolfskin is Synthetic outer shell with DWR coating (unspecified type) where the Patagonia is Polyester fleece (recycled), which is most of the difference in these two grades.
  • The gap is 70 points, wide enough that this is not a close call, and the Patagonia is the one to buy.
  • We are less certain about the Jack Wolfskin grade, at 42% confidence against 72%, because it discloses less.

Both products run through the same public rubric: materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →

More waterproof winter gloves: see the full ranking