Men's Nike ACG Phantazma Storm FIT ADV Jacket vs Women's Dirt Roamer Storm Jacket: which is safer?
Patagonia Women's Dirt Roamer Storm Jacket is our pick, better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.
Nike
Men's Nike ACG Phantazma Storm FIT ADV Jacket
PFAS grade
Overall grade
Verdict
Hazard flags
Material
Confidence
LikelyPFAS in water-repellent coating water-repellent coating
PossibleFormaldehyde in synthetic textile resins
PossibleAntimony in polyester fiber
Our pick
Patagonia
Women's Dirt Roamer Storm Jacket
PFAS grade
Overall grade
Verdict
Hazard flags
Material
Confidence
PossibleAzo dyes and color fastness
PossibleAntimony in polyester fiber
Reportedwater-repellent coating degradation and re-treatment chemicals
Where these two actually differ
- We flag PFAS in DWR water-repellent coating, Formaldehyde in synthetic textile resins and VOC off-gassing from synthetic finishes on the Nike and not on the Patagonia.
- We flag Azo dyes and color fastness, DWR coating degradation and re-treatment chemicals and Unverified DWR chemistry on the Patagonia and not on the Nike.
- Both carry a flag for Antimony in polyester fiber, so neither choice avoids it.
- The Nike is synthetic textile with DWR water-repellent treatment where the Patagonia is polyester shell with DWR finish, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
- The gap is 25 points, wide enough that this is not a close call, and the Patagonia is the one to buy.
- We are less certain about the Nike grade, at 45% confidence against 72%, because it discloses less.
Both products run through the same public rubric, which covers materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →
More cycling rain jackets, see the full ranking