PFAS20/ 100Bad
Overall0/ 100Bad
Men's Nike ACG Phantazma Storm FIT ADV Jacket

Nike · Cycling Rain Jackets

Men's Nike ACG Phantazma Storm FIT ADV Jacket

Bad

ACG line uses water-repellent coating finishes; Nike silent on PFAS composition.

Verdict: SkipPFAS-treated water-repellent coating fabric with silent brand disclosure; non-PFAS hazards minimal but durability and care matter.

Nike's ACG Phantazma Storm jacket likely includes water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) treatment, which may contain PFAS. Nike does not publicly disclose PFAS-free status or test results for this product.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

synthetic textile with water-repellent coating water-repellent treatment

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

65/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

clothing is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

70/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

PFAS

Nike ACG line confirmed to use water-repellent coating finishes; brand provides no composition disclosure. Fluorinated repellents are industry standard and persist in body and environment after washing.

Source: ATSDR
20/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Polyester and nylon blends may contain trace formaldehyde from dye-setting or wrinkle-resistance finishes. Nike does not publish finish chemistry; levels in finished apparel are typically low if ventilation occurs before retail.

Source: ATSDR
70/ 100
⚠️

Antimony in polyester fiber

Polyester production may use antimony oxide as a catalyst. Finished garments retain minimal residual antimony and no health risk is established from wearing treated polyester, but migration in sweat is not well studied.

70/ 100
💨

VOC off-gassing from synthetic finishes

water-repellent coating and dye finishes can emit volatile compounds in first 1-2 weeks post-manufacture. Airing the jacket outdoors before first wear reduces initial off-gassing; no Nike-specific testing data available.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

⛏️

Heavy metals

No recalls or testing data specific to Nike ACG dyes. Synthetic textiles in major brand athletic wear are generally screened for restricted azo dyes under REACH/ZDHC standards, though Nike does not disclose testing results publicly.

Source: FDA
95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

The Nike ACG Phantazma Storm uses a synthetic textile base (likely polyester or nylon blend) treated with a water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) finish to shed water. water-repellent coating coatings are the primary vector for PFAS in outerwear; Nike has not disclosed whether this jacket uses fluorine-based or fluorine-free alternatives. The synthetic fiber itself carries lower chemical risk than the applied treatment layer.

The brand's record and disclosure

Nike has no published commitment to PFAS phase-out in apparel and remains silent on water-repellent coating chemistry across its technical line, including ACG. The brand does not provide material safety data sheets or supplier transparency for chemical treatments on consumer websites. Nike's sustainability messaging focuses on recycled content and carbon, not chemical hazard reduction.

How it compares in its category

Most technical outerwear at this price point (USD 150-300 range) uses conventional fluorinated water-repellent coating; fewer competitors disclose alternatives. Brands like Patagonia and Arc'teryx have begun transitioning to fluorine-free water-repellent coating on select lines, though availability remains limited. Nike's silence puts this jacket in the middle of the market for chemical transparency, neither best nor worst practice.

If you buy it

Wash sparingly (cold water, gentle cycle) to extend water-repellent coating and minimize potential PFAS leaching into wastewater; avoid heat drying. The water-repellent coating treatment degrades over 30-50 washes; re-treatment products often reintroduce PFAS. Store in a cool, dry place away from direct heat. Consider its lifespan; durability of the base fabric typically outlasts the water-repellent finish.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 45% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Nike has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Safer alternatives in Cycling Rain Jackets

Mens Balance Made In Usa Cycling Jacket Windbreaker Water Resistant

Mens Balance Made In Usa Cycling Jacket Windbreaker Water Resistant

Synthetic fabric with water-resistant water-repellent coating, unspecified

PFAS Grade25Poor
Overall Grade17Bad
♾️

PFAS

Limited concern

70
🫧

Microplastic shedding from synthetic fabric

Limited concern

70

Skip until New Balance discloses water-repellent coating treatment details.

Waterproof or stain-proof treatment

More cycling rain jackets grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.