Women's Effortless Essential Square Neck Tankini Top vs Women's Bottom Turn Racerback Bikini Top: which is safer?

Patagonia Women's Bottom Turn Racerback Bikini Top is the clear pick. Nike Women's Effortless Essential Square Neck Tankini Top carries a failing PFAS grade, and we never recommend buying a failing product.

Nike Women's Effortless Essential Square Neck Tankini Top

Nike

Women's Effortless Essential Square Neck Tankini Top

PFAS grade

Good 65/100

Overall grade

Poor 47/100

Verdict

Skip

Hazard flags

⚑ 3

Material

Nylon/polyester blend (tankini textile)

Confidence

72%

PossibleFormaldehyde resins in fabric finishing

ReportedMicroplastic shedding during wear and wash

PossibleElastic degradation and fit loss

Our pick

Patagonia Women's Bottom Turn Racerback Bikini Top

Patagonia

Women's Bottom Turn Racerback Bikini Top

PFAS grade

Excellent 90/100

Overall grade

Excellent 86/100

Verdict

Buy

Hazard flags

⚑ 1

Material

Nylon/polyester blend with elastane (standard swimwear)

Confidence

72%

PossibleElastane (spandex) degradation under heat or chlorine

Where these two actually differ

  • We flag Formaldehyde resins in fabric finishing, Microplastic shedding during wear and wash and Elastic degradation and fit loss on the Nike and not on the Patagonia.
  • We flag Elastane (spandex) degradation under heat or chlorine on the Patagonia and not on the Nike.
  • The Nike is Nylon/polyester blend (tankini textile) where the Patagonia is Nylon/polyester blend with elastane (standard swimwear), which is most of the difference in these two grades.
  • The gap is 25 points, wide enough that this is not a close call, and the Patagonia is the one to buy.

Both products run through the same public rubric, which covers materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →

More swimwear, see the full ranking