Norrøna Lofoten Gore-Tex Thermo100 Short Gloves vs Better Sweater Gloves Patagonia Women's: which is safer?
Better Sweater Gloves Patagonia Women's is the clear pick. Norrøna Lofoten Gore-Tex Thermo100 Short Gloves carries a failing PFAS grade, and we never recommend buying a failing product.
Norrona
Norrøna Lofoten Gore-Tex Thermo100 Short Gloves
PFAS grade
Overall grade
Verdict
Hazard flags
Material
Confidence
PossibleTeflon-type coating membrane degradation and microfiber release
PossibleAzo dyes in colored shells
PossibleAntimony in polyester content
Our pick
Patagonia
Better Sweater Gloves Patagonia Women's
PFAS grade
Overall grade
Verdict
Hazard flags
Material
Confidence
PossibleAzo dyes and heavy metal pigments
PossibleMicroplastic shedding during wash
Where these two actually differ
- We flag PTFE membrane degradation and microfiber release, Azo dyes in colored shells and Antimony in polyester content on the Norrona and not on the Patagonia.
- We flag Azo dyes and heavy metal pigments and Microplastic shedding during wash on the Patagonia and not on the Norrona.
- The Norrona is Gore-Tex membrane (PTFE-based) + synthetic shell where the Patagonia is Polyester fleece (recycled), which is most of the difference in these two grades.
- The gap is 70 points, wide enough that this is not a close call, and the Patagonia is the one to buy.
Both products run through the same public rubric: materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →
More waterproof winter gloves: see the full ranking