Black Hole Pack 25L Patagonia vs Refugio Day Pack 30L: which is safer?

Black Hole Pack 25L Patagonia is our pick, better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.

Our pick

Black Hole Pack 25L Patagonia

Patagonia

Black Hole Pack 25L Patagonia

PFAS grade

Poor 45/100

Overall grade

Poor 37/100

Verdict

Skip

Hazard flags

⚑ 2

Material

nylon/polyester pack with water-repellent coating

Confidence

35%

Possiblewater-repellent coating chemistry (unverified PFAS status)

PossibleNylon/polyester microfiber shedding

Patagonia Refugio Day Pack 30L

Patagonia

Refugio Day Pack 30L

PFAS grade

Poor 45/100

Overall grade

Bad 13/100

Verdict

Skip

Hazard flags

⚑ 3

Material

Nylon/polyester blend with water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) treatment

Confidence

62%

Possiblewater-repellent coating chemistry (unspecified replacement for PFAS)

ReportedNylon and polyester fiber shedding / microfiber release

LikelyCoating degradation over time

Where these two actually differ

  • We flag DWR coating chemistry (unverified PFAS status) and Nylon/polyester microfiber shedding on the Patagonia and not on the Patagonia.
  • We flag DWR coating chemistry (unspecified replacement for PFAS), Nylon and polyester fiber shedding / microfiber release and Coating degradation over time on the Patagonia and not on the Patagonia.
  • The Patagonia is nylon/polyester pack with DWR coating where the Patagonia is Nylon/polyester blend with DWR (durable water repellent) treatment, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
  • These two are level, close enough that price and fit should decide it rather than our grade.
  • We are less certain about the Patagonia grade, at 35% confidence against 62%, because it discloses less.

Both products run through the same public rubric, which covers materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →

More backpacks, see the full ranking