Men's R2 TechFace Hoody vs Men's Salomon Sense Aero Wind Jacket: which is safer?
Patagonia Men's R2 TechFace Hoody is our pick: better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.
Our pick
Patagonia
Men's R2 TechFace Hoody
PFAS grade
Good 65/100
Overall grade
analysis pending
Verdict
pending
Hazard flags
none flagged
Material
Polyester shell with water-repellent coating treatment
Confidence
78%
Salomon
Men's Salomon Sense Aero Wind Jacket
PFAS grade
Bad 20/100
Overall grade
Bad 12/100
Verdict
Skip
Hazard flags
⚑ 2
Material
Nylon/polyester shell with water-resistant treatment (water-repellent coating)
Confidence
45%
PossiblePFAS in water-repellent coating (non-PFAS assessment note)
Possiblewater-repellent coating degradation and microfiber release
Where these two actually differ
- We flag PFAS in DWR coating (non-PFAS assessment note) and DWR coating degradation and microfiber release on the Salomon and not on the Patagonia.
- The Patagonia is Polyester shell with DWR treatment where the Salomon is Nylon/polyester shell with water-resistant treatment (DWR), which is most of the difference in these two grades.
- The gap is 45 points, wide enough that this is not a close call, and the Patagonia is the one to buy.
- We are less certain about the Salomon grade, at 45% confidence against 78%, because it discloses less.
Both products run through the same public rubric: materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →
More softshell jackets: see the full ranking