Men's R2 TechFace Hoody vs Men's Equipe Softshell Jacket: which is safer?

Patagonia Men's R2 TechFace Hoody is our pick, better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.

Our pick

Patagonia Men's R2 TechFace Hoody

Patagonia

Men's R2 TechFace Hoody

PFAS grade

Poor 45/100

Overall grade

Poor 27/100

Verdict

Skip

Hazard flags

⚑ 3

Material

Polyester shell with water-repellent coating treatment

Confidence

78%

Possiblewater-repellent coating treatment chemistry (non-PFAS)

ReportedPolyester microfiber shedding

PossibleHeat sensitivity and thermal decomposition

Salomon Men's Equipe Softshell Jacket

Salomon

Men's Equipe Softshell Jacket

PFAS grade

Bad 20/100

Overall grade

Bad 12/100

Verdict

Skip

Hazard flags

⚑ 2

Material

Polyester softshell with water-repellent coating water-repellent finish

Confidence

45%

PossiblePFAS in water-repellent coating water-repellent finish

Possiblewater-repellent coating degradation and particulate shedding

Where these two actually differ

  • We flag DWR treatment chemistry (non-PFAS), Polyester microfiber shedding and Heat sensitivity and thermal decomposition on the Patagonia and not on the Salomon.
  • We flag PFAS in DWR water-repellent finish and DWR coating degradation and particulate shedding on the Salomon and not on the Patagonia.
  • The Patagonia is Polyester shell with DWR treatment where the Salomon is Polyester softshell with DWR water-repellent finish, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
  • The gap is 25 points, wide enough that this is not a close call, and the Patagonia is the one to buy.
  • We are less certain about the Salomon grade, at 45% confidence against 78%, because it discloses less.

Both products run through the same public rubric, which covers materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →

More softshell jackets, see the full ranking