PFAS20/ 100Bad
Overall12/ 100Bad
Salomon Men's Equipe Softshell Jacket

Salomon · Softshell Jackets

Salomon Men's Equipe Softshell Jacket

Bad

Avoid until Salomon clarifies water-repellent coating chemistry, softshell waterproofing commonly uses PFAS.

Verdict: SkipPolyester softshell with undisclosed water-repellent coating chemistry poses moderate PFAS risk; no other established hazards on record. Safe if maintained dry and replaced before coating degrades.

This polyester softshell uses a water-repellent coating treatment historically associated with PFAS, but Salomon doesn't publicly disclose the water-repellent coating's chemical composition. Request detailed specifications or consider brands with transparent sourcing.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Polyester softshell with water-repellent coating water-repellent finish

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent treatments have historically contained PFAS chemicals.

65/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

PFAS exposure happens more often with clothing products.

70/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

The company has not publicly discussed PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

PFAS

Softshell jackets commonly use PFAS-based water-repellent coating. Salomon has not disclosed the specific chemistry for this model. PFAS can leach into skin and accumulate in the body over repeated, long-term wear.

Source: ATSDR
70/ 100
🫧

water-repellent coating degradation and particulate shedding

As the water-repellent coating layer wears over time and through washing, microparticles of the coating may shed. If the coating contains PFAS, this represents a secondary exposure route. Proper care (avoiding abrasion, limiting heat) reduces shedding.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

Azo dyes in polyester

No public record of azo dye violations or concerns specific to Salomon apparel. Polyester in reputable brands is typically dyed with compliant azo-free or low-risk dyes, though certification documentation is not publicly available for this model.

95/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Softshell polyester typically does not undergo formaldehyde-heavy finishing (unlike cotton wrinkle-resist treatments). No known formaldehyde risk is documented for Salomon softshells, but fabric finishing chemistry is not disclosed.

Source: ATSDR
95/ 100

Antimony in polyester polymer

Antimony oxide is used as a polymerization catalyst in some polyester production but is generally locked within the polymer matrix and not bioavailable during wear. No specific antimony concern is on record for Salomon apparel.

95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

This jacket is polyester softshell fabric with a water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) finish applied to the surface. Polyester itself is stable and non-leaching, but the water-repellent coating is the concern: it repels water and stains, and in the softshell category, most commercial water-repellent coating finishes historically rely on PFAS "forever chemicals" (PFAS), although some brands have migrated to fluorine-free alternatives. Salomon has not publicly disclosed which chemistry they use for this model, leaving the water-repellent coating hazard unresolved.

The brand's record and disclosure

Salomon (owned by Amer Sports) has not issued a public commitment to phasing out PFAS in apparel or published third-party test results for water-repellent coating-treated products. The brand maintains no visible transparency portal or chemical disclosure policy comparable to outdoor peers like Patagonia or The North Face, both of whom have committed to PFAS-free water treatments. Without direct inquiry to Salomon, consumers cannot verify whether this jacket uses legacy PFAS or modern alternatives.

How it compares in its category

Softshell jackets in this price and performance tier typically carry the same water-repellent coating chemistry gamble. Brands with explicit PFAS-free certifications (e.g., Patagonia, some Arc'teryx lines) or third-party eco-certifications (Bluesign, OEKO-TEX) provide clearer chemical baselines. Salomon's lack of disclosure places this jacket in the middle of the risk spectrum for the category, neither worst nor best practice.

If you buy it

Keep the jacket dry-cleaned or hand-washed in cool water to minimize leaching of any surface coatings. Avoid machine drying or high heat, which can degrade the water-repellent coating layer and potentially release coating particles. Replace the jacket when the water-repellent coating visibly wears (water no longer beads on fabric) or after 5 to 7 years of regular use. Before purchase, contact Salomon directly to confirm the water-repellent coating chemistry; if they cannot or will not specify, that silence itself is a data point.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 45% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Salomon has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Safer alternatives in Softshell Jackets

Patagonia Men's R2 TechFace Hoody

Patagonia

Men's R2 TechFace Hoody

Polyester shell with water-repellent coating treatment

PFAS Grade65Good
Good

Lower concern, Patagonia's public PFAS phase-out and explicit Teflon-type coating-free claim support this choice.

Bluesign®

Waterproof or stain-proof treatment

More softshell jackets grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.