Men's R2 TechFace Hoody vs Men's Shkout Fly Windbreaker: which is safer?
Patagonia Men's R2 TechFace Hoody is our pick, better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.
Our pick
Patagonia
Men's R2 TechFace Hoody
PFAS grade
Overall grade
Verdict
Hazard flags
Material
Confidence
Possiblewater-repellent coating treatment chemistry (non-PFAS)
ReportedPolyester microfiber shedding
PossibleHeat sensitivity and thermal decomposition
Salomon
Men's Shkout Fly Windbreaker
PFAS grade
Overall grade
Verdict
Hazard flags
Material
Confidence
LikelyFluorocarbon-based water-repellent coating (PFAS surrogate)
PossibleFormaldehyde in finishes
PossibleVOC off-gassing from finishes
Where these two actually differ
- We flag DWR treatment chemistry (non-PFAS), Polyester microfiber shedding and Heat sensitivity and thermal decomposition on the Patagonia and not on the Salomon.
- We flag Fluorocarbon-based DWR (PFAS surrogate), Formaldehyde in finishes and VOC off-gassing from finishes on the Salomon and not on the Patagonia.
- The Patagonia is Polyester shell with DWR treatment where the Salomon is Polyester shell with DWR (durable water-repellent) finish, likely fluorocarbon-based, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
- The gap is 25 points, wide enough that this is not a close call, and the Patagonia is the one to buy.
- We are less certain about the Salomon grade, at 45% confidence against 78%, because it discloses less.
Both products run through the same public rubric, which covers materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →
More softshell jackets, see the full ranking