PFAS20/ 100Bad
Overall0/ 100Bad
Salomon Men's Shkout Fly Windbreaker

Salomon · Softshell Jackets

Salomon Men's Shkout Fly Windbreaker

Bad

Avoid until Salomon discloses water-repellent coating chemistry, windbreakers typically use PFAS.

Verdict: SkipPFAS-coated water-repellent coating is the primary concern; Salomon has not disclosed chemistry. Non-PFAS hazards are minimal if jacket is used as intended.

The polyester shell includes a water-repellent treatment likely based on fluorocarbon chemistry, but Salomon makes no public disclosure of whether the water-repellent coating is PFAS-free. Most windbreakers in this category still use legacy PFAS.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Polyester shell with water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) finish, likely fluorocarbon-based

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent treatments have historically contained PFAS chemicals.

65/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

PFAS exposure happens more often with clothing products.

70/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

The company has not publicly discussed PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

PFAS

Polyester softshell jackets at this tier almost universally use fluorocarbon water-repellent coating unless explicitly labeled otherwise. Salomon's non-disclosure and lack of public commitment make PFAS presence probable, though not lab-confirmed for this specific SKU.

Source: ATSDR
20/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Synthetic finishes and wrinkle-resistance treatments may contain formaldehyde releasers. Salomon does not publish finish specifications. Exposure during wear is minimal; washing reduces residual formaldehyde.

Source: ATSDR
70/ 100
💨

VOC off-gassing from finishes

New polyester garments may release volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from water-repellent coating and dyes, particularly when stored warm. Airing the jacket outdoors for 24 to 48 hours before first wear reduces exposure.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

Azo dyes in polyester

Polyester textiles can be dyed with azo compounds, some of which are restricted under OEKO-TEX and EU regulations. No specific recalls or concerns are on record for Salomon apparel, and the brand does not disclose dye chemistry.

95/ 100

Antimony in polyester

Antimony trioxide is a common polyester catalyst; modern manufacturing limits leaching. No health incidents or recalls specific to Salomon outerwear suggest this is not a practical concern in this product.

95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

The Shkout Fly uses a polyester shell with a water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) finish. water-repellent coating coatings in this product class are historically fluorocarbon-based (PFAS), though Salomon has not publicly specified the chemistry of this jacket. Polyester itself is stable under normal wear; the chemical risk lies entirely in the water-repellent coating treatment and any dyes or finishes applied during manufacturing.

The brand's record and disclosure

Salomon has not published a public commitment to PFAS-free water-repellent coating or disclosed the specific water-repellent chemistry used in their apparel lines. The brand is owned by Amer Sports, which has made limited commitments on fluorochemical phase-out compared to some competitors (e.g., Patagonia, Arc'teryx). No major recalls or public hazard disclosures are on record for this specific model.

How it compares in its category

Most mainstream softshell windbreakers in this price and performance range use fluorocarbon water-repellent coating. Competitors offering verified PFAS-free or explicitly low-fluorine alternatives include some Patagonia models and a subset of Arc'teryx jackets. Salomon's silence on water-repellent coating chemistry is typical of the broader outdoor apparel industry but increasingly seen as a gap relative to brands with public commitments.

If you buy it

Launder infrequently; machine washing degrades water-repellent coating but does not significantly increase PFAS leaching into skin. Avoid high heat (tumble dry low or air dry). If you prioritize avoiding potential PFAS exposure, request Salomon's water-repellent coating certification or choose a brand with transparent fluorine-free claims. Jacket durability under normal use is not compromised by the chemical composition; the concern is environmental and systemic rather than acute use-phase risk.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 45% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Salomon has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Safer alternatives in Softshell Jackets

Patagonia Men's R2 TechFace Hoody

Patagonia

Men's R2 TechFace Hoody

Polyester shell with water-repellent coating treatment

PFAS Grade65Good
Good

Lower concern, Patagonia's public PFAS phase-out and explicit Teflon-type coating-free claim support this choice.

Bluesign®

Waterproof or stain-proof treatment

More softshell jackets grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.