Men's R2 Yulex Regulator Front-Zip Full Wetsuit vs Wetsuits Men's IconX Full Wetsuit: which is safer?
Patagonia Men's R2 Yulex Regulator Front-Zip Full Wetsuit is the clear pick. Xcel Wetsuits Men's IconX Full Wetsuit carries a failing PFAS grade, and we never recommend buying a failing product.
Our pick
Patagonia
Men's R2 Yulex Regulator Front-Zip Full Wetsuit
PFAS grade
Overall grade
Verdict
Hazard flags
Material
Confidence
PossibleFormaldehyde-releasing resins (glues/seams)
LikelyMicroplastics shedding from outer shell
Xcel
Wetsuits Men's IconX Full Wetsuit
PFAS grade
Overall grade
Verdict
Hazard flags
Material
Confidence
LikelyFluorinated water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) treatment
PossibleNeoprene degradation and off-gassing
PossibleMicroplastic shedding from synthetic fibers
Where these two actually differ
- We flag Formaldehyde-releasing resins (glues/seams) and Microplastics shedding from outer shell on the Patagonia and not on the Xcel.
- We flag Fluorinated durable water repellent (DWR) treatment, Neoprene degradation and off-gassing and Microplastic shedding from synthetic fibers on the Xcel and not on the Patagonia.
- The Patagonia is Yulex (synthetic rubber), neoprene-free base where the Xcel is Neoprene/nylon/polyester blend with unspecified waterproof treatment, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
- The gap is 70 points, wide enough that this is not a close call, and the Patagonia is the one to buy.
- We are less certain about the Xcel grade, at 42% confidence against 72%, because it discloses less.
Both products run through the same public rubric, which covers materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →
More wetsuits, see the full ranking