Baking Soda Free Deodorant vs Deodorant: which is safer?

Primally Pure Baking Soda Free Deodorant is our pick, better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.

Our pick

Primally Pure Baking Soda Free Deodorant

Primally Pure

Baking Soda Free Deodorant

PFAS grade

Excellent 100/100

Overall grade

Excellent 96/100

Verdict

Buy

Hazard flags

⚑ 1

Material

mineral-based powder blend (arrowroot, magnesium hydroxide, mica)

Confidence

82%

PossibleSkin irritation from magnesium hydroxide alkalinity

Schmidt's Deodorant

Schmidt's

Deodorant

PFAS grade

Excellent 75/100

Overall grade

Good 63/100

Verdict

Buy

Hazard flags

⚑ 3

Material

Natural mineral powders, plant-based waxes, arrowroot powder

Confidence

78%

PossibleFragrance allergens (natural essential oils or synthetic fragrance)

PossibleBaking soda sensitivity (in some formulations)

PossibleSkin barrier disruption from high alkalinity

Where these two actually differ

  • We flag Skin irritation from magnesium hydroxide alkalinity on the Primally Pure and not on the Schmidt's.
  • We flag Fragrance allergens (natural essential oils or synthetic fragrance), Baking soda sensitivity (in some formulations) and Skin barrier disruption from high alkalinity on the Schmidt's and not on the Primally Pure.
  • The Primally Pure is mineral-based powder blend (arrowroot, magnesium hydroxide, mica) where the Schmidt's is Natural mineral powders, plant-based waxes, arrowroot powder, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
  • The gap is 25 points, wide enough that this is not a close call, and the Primally Pure is the one to buy.

Both products run through the same public rubric, which covers materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →

More deodorant, see the full ranking