Baking Soda Free Deodorant vs Deodorant Rose and Vanilla: which is safer?
Primally Pure Baking Soda Free Deodorant is our pick, better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.
Our pick
Primally Pure
Baking Soda Free Deodorant
PFAS grade
Excellent 100/100
Overall grade
Excellent 96/100
Verdict
Buy
Hazard flags
⚑ 1
Material
mineral-based powder blend (arrowroot, magnesium hydroxide, mica)
Confidence
82%
PossibleSkin irritation from magnesium hydroxide alkalinity
Schmidt's
Deodorant Rose and Vanilla
PFAS grade
Excellent 75/100
Overall grade
Good 63/100
Verdict
Buy
Hazard flags
⚑ 3
Material
natural mineral-based powder stick (arrowroot, shea butter, coconut oil base)
Confidence
78%
PossibleFragrance allergens (essential oils and fragrance compounds)
PossibleSkin irritation from essential oils
PossibleCoconut oil comedogenicity
Where these two actually differ
- We flag Skin irritation from magnesium hydroxide alkalinity on the Primally Pure and not on the Schmidt's.
- We flag Fragrance allergens (essential oils and fragrance compounds), Skin irritation from essential oils and Coconut oil comedogenicity on the Schmidt's and not on the Primally Pure.
- The Primally Pure is mineral-based powder blend (arrowroot, magnesium hydroxide, mica) where the Schmidt's is natural mineral-based powder stick (arrowroot, shea butter, coconut oil base), which is most of the difference in these two grades.
- The gap is 25 points, wide enough that this is not a close call, and the Primally Pure is the one to buy.
Both products run through the same public rubric, which covers materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →
More deodorant, see the full ranking