PFAS75/ 100Excellent
Overall63/ 100Good
Schmidt's Deodorant Rose and Vanilla

Schmidt's · Deodorant

Schmidt's Deodorant Rose and Vanilla

Excellent

Lower PFAS concern; simple mineral deodorant with no identified risk triggers.

Verdict: BuySimple mineral-based formula with no established hazard record; lower PFAS risk profile; transparent ingredient list supports safety.

Schmidt's Rose and Vanilla is a natural mineral-based stick with no known PFAS-associated ingredients or coatings. Deodorants typically need no water-resistant or nonstick treatments commonly containing PFAS.

Check price on Amazon →

We flunk more products than we pass. This one earned its grade. How we grade

Material

natural mineral-based powder stick (arrowroot, shea butter, coconut oil base)

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

No PFAS disclosure

The company has not publicly discussed PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

cosmetics is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

80/ 100
⚠️

Fragrance allergens (essential oils and fragrance compounds)

Rose and vanilla formulations typically use essential oil blends and fragrance compounds. Schmidt's does not disclose full fragrance component lists. Contact dermatitis or sensitization can occur in individuals with fragrance sensitivity, though incidence is low in the general population.

70/ 100
⚠️

Skin irritation from essential oils

Rose essential oil and related botanicals can cause irritation, redness, or rash in sensitive individuals when applied repeatedly to underarm skin. No incidents specific to this product are on record, but essential oil-based deodorants carry this general risk.

70/ 100
⚠️

Coconut oil comedogenicity

Coconut oil is moderately comedogenic and may trigger acne or folliculitis in individuals prone to underarm sensitivity or in hot, humid climates where sweat traps the occlusive oil base.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

Safe base material

Made from ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber with no PFAS risk.

100/ 100

Talc absence mitigates historical lung risk

This product contains arrowroot, not talc. Arrowroot powder has not been linked to mesothelioma or lung disease in the way talc has, reducing a historical category hazard.

95/ 100
⛏️

Heavy metals

No heavy metal contamination has been reported in Schmidt's products. Arrowroot, shea butter, and coconut oil are unlikely vectors for lead or cadmium; pigments (if used for color) would be disclosed on label.

Source: FDA
95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Schmidt's Rose and Vanilla is a stick deodorant built on arrowroot powder, shea butter, and coconut oil, all common food-grade or cosmetic-grade naturals with minimal processing. The formula contains no aluminum salts (antiperspirant active), no synthetic polymers, and no talc, which removes three major historical hazard pathways in the deodorant category. Essential oils and fragrance compounds provide scent; the brand does not disclose full fragrance components, which is standard industry practice but limits transparency on potential allergens.

The brand's record and disclosure

Schmidt's has built its market position around 'natural' positioning and has faced no major product recalls or safety warnings on record. The brand does not publish PFAS testing data or make explicit PFAS avoidance claims, which aligns with most conventional deodorant makers, this is neither a red flag nor proof of absence. Schmidt's does list ingredients on packaging and online; no regulatory or third-party investigations of this product line have been publicly documented.

How it compares in its category

Mineral-oil and powder-based sticks like this sit in the lower-risk segment of deodorants compared to spray aerosols (which carry inhalation risk) and antiperspirants with aluminum salts (systemic absorption concern, though debated). Natural stick deodorants have become mainstream and are not inherently safer than synthetic ones, but arrowroot and oil bases carry fewer known irritants than talc or certain synthetic polymers. Schmidt's pricing and availability reflect mainstream consumer acceptance rather than niche positioning.

If you buy it

Store in cool, dry conditions to prevent softening or separation of oils and powders. Patch-test on inner arm if you have sensitive skin, as essential oils (especially in rose formulations) can trigger contact dermatitis in a small percentage of users. Replace when noticeably depleted or if you notice rancid odor (sign of coconut oil degradation). No special maintenance needed; this is a single-use disposable product.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 78% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Schmidt's has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Safer alternatives in Deodorant

Deodorant Cream 2oz Glass

Puracy

Deodorant Cream 2oz Glass

Glass jar; water-based cream formula

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade82Excellent
⚠️

Fragrance allergens

Limited concern

70
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Glass container breakage

Moderate concern

45

Low concern, glass container and water-based cream with PFAS-free commitment.

Bare metal or glass, no coating at all

Tom's of Maine Deodorant

Tom's of Maine

Deodorant

mineral-based, baking soda formulation

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade82Excellent
⚠️

Fragrance allergen content

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Baking soda skin irritation

Moderate concern

45
🫧

Microplastic shedding

Limited concern

70

Lower concern from mineral-based formula with public PFAS-free positioning, though no independent third-party verification.

Risky category by default

Tom's of Maine Most-Loved Deodorant Bundle

Tom's of Maine

Most-Loved Deodorant Bundle

mineral-based and plant-derived actives; stick formulation

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade92Excellent
⚠️

Fragrance allergens

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Skin irritation from mineral salts

Limited concern

70

Lower-concern deodorant with mineral-based formula and PFAS-free claim aligned to brand ethos, but no third-party verification found.

Risky category by default

More deodorant grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.