PFAS65/ 100Good
Overall57/ 100Good
Athleta Women's Transcend Scoop Sports Bra

Athleta · Sports Bras

Athleta Women's Transcend Scoop Sports Bra

Good

Lower-concern sports bra with no water-repellent treatment on record.

Verdict · SkipNylon-spandex sports bra with no known hazards; PFAS profile is lower-concern and brand opacity does not override acceptable material safety.

The nylon and spandex blend has no disclosed water-repellent or stain-resistant coating. Athleta has no PFAS statement on record for this product.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

nylon, spandex blend

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

You may also be interested in

Top-graded picks in the categories readers replace first, every one scored on the same rubric.

  • polypropylene filter housing, carbon/sediment cartridge
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Bacterial growth in spent cartridges

3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

  • RO membrane, carbon filters, stainless steel housing
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Bacterial and microbial growth in housing and filters

4 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Avocado Vegan Mattress

Avocado

Vegan Mattress

100ExcellentPFAS grade
✓ MADE SAFE Certified✓ Global Organic Textile Standard (GOTS)
  • organic cotton, natural latex, coconut coir, recycled steel coils
  • The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
  • Heavy metals

2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

What Athleta Women's Transcend Scoop Sports Bra is made of, ingredients and materials

The Transcend Scoop is a nylon and spandex blend, both synthetic polymers chosen for stretch, durability, and moisture management in athletic wear. Nylon does not inherently leach toxic compounds under normal wear or wash conditions, and spandex (polyurethane-based elastomer) similarly has no established migration of harmful substances during typical use. Neither material is treated with flame retardants as a standard practice in intimate apparel, and no evidence suggests this product uses azo dyes or formaldehyde-releasing finishes that are common hazards in lower-cost textiles.

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

70/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
⏳

Spandex elastomer degradation and leaching

Spandex can degrade under prolonged UV exposure, heat, and chlorine exposure (e.g., repeated pool use), releasing oligomers that may cause mild skin irritation in sensitive individuals. This is a material-class issue, not specific to Athleta, and is managed through proper care (air-dry, avoid chlorine when possible, replace every 1-2 years).

70/ 100
🎨

Dye migration and allergic contact dermatitis

Nylon-spandex blends in any brand can occasionally cause contact dermatitis in individuals with dye sensitivity, particularly on skin exposed to moisture and friction (underarm, breast tissue). Risk is low with mainstream brands but not zero; patch-test new items if you have a history of textile-related skin reactions.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

✅

Base material not linked to PFAS

The main material recorded for this product is not one associated with PFAS.

100/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Athleta's mid-market positioning and use of standard nylon-spandex blends suggest conventional dyeing and finishing without heavy use of azo dyes (associated with allergic contact dermatitis) or formaldehyde resins. No public recalls or complaints document this product as a source of dye-related or formaldehyde exposure.

Source, ATSDR ↗
95/ 100
✅

Antimony in polyester

This product is nylon and spandex, not polyester, so antimony catalyst residues are not a concern; antimony is primarily a manufacturing byproduct in PET polyester, not these materials.

95/ 100
🔥

Flame retardants

Intimate apparel (bras, underwear) is not subject to flammability standards that trigger flame retardant application in the US, and no evidence suggests Athleta adds these chemicals to sports bras as a voluntary measure.

Source, EPA ↗
95/ 100

How is this PFAS grade calculated?

The brand's record and disclosure

Athleta (owned by Gap Inc.) has not published detailed PFAS or chemical transparency reports specific to their production methods, making their stance on water-repellent treatments opaque. However, the Transcend Scoop shows no signs of water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) coating, which is the primary vector for PFAS in athletic wear, suggesting lower fluorochemical exposure risk regardless of brand disclosure gaps. Athleta holds limited third-party certifications (not GOTS, Bluesign, or OEKO-TEX certified as far as publicly documented), which limits independent verification of chemical controls.

How it compares in its category

This product sits in the mid-market athletic bra segment where nylon-spandex blends are standard and generally carry lower chemical risk than budget alternatives using heavy dyes or adhesives. Comparable brands like Patagonia (more transparent on PFAS) and Allbirds (certified recycled synthetics) offer higher disclosure, while Athleta's silence on chemicals is typical of mainstream athletic brands that do not prioritize public accountability. Price and performance sit between fast-fashion bras (higher chemical risk, worse disclosure) and premium sustainable brands (higher transparency, higher cost).

If you buy it

Wash in cool water and avoid fabric softeners, which can degrade spandex over time and may contain unnecessary additives. Air-dry rather than machine-dry to preserve elasticity and avoid heat-related polymer stress; tumble drying is not necessary for bras and accelerates material aging. Replace after 12-18 months of regular use or when elastic noticeably loses recovery; spandex degrades gradually through wear and body oils, not through contamination risk. No special precautions are needed beyond standard athletic wear care; this product does not pose acute chemical hazards during normal use.

What is not known about PFAS in this product?

Basis
Model estimate, 72% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Athleta has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

More sports bras grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.