PFAS35/ 100Poor
Overall31/ 100Poor
Calphalon Contemporary Stainless Steel Round Grill Pan

Calphalon · Grill Pans

Calphalon Contemporary Stainless Steel Round Grill Pan

Poor

Lower concern; stainless steel grill pan with no nonstick coating reduces PFAS risk significantly.

Verdict: SkipStainless steel construction with no nonstick coating eliminates PFAS and Teflon-type coating fume risk; minimal chemical hazard profile for this category.

This Calphalon grill pan is stainless steel without nonstick coating, which avoids the primary cookware vector for PFAS. Stainless steel is durable and inert with established lower PFAS concern than coated nonstick.

The safe swap

GreenPan Bobby Flay 11" Cast Iron Square Grill Pan

GreenPan

GreenPan Bobby Flay 11" Cast Iron Square Grill Pan

90/100 safety

90Excellent

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

stainless steel, non-nonstick

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Stain-resistant finish

Stain resistance treatments commonly use PFAS chemicals.

80/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

PFAS exposure happens more often with clothing products.

70/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

The company has not publicly discussed PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
⛏️

Stainless steel nickel or chromium leaching under acidic conditions

Stainless steel can release trace amounts of nickel and chromium in prolonged contact with strong acids (vinegar, wine, citrus); the risk is low for occasional grill use but slightly elevated if pan is misused for long-term acidic food storage. This is a standard property of stainless steel cookware across the category, not brand-specific.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

Aluminum leaching

This product is stainless steel, not aluminum, so aluminum leaching is not a concern.

95/ 100

Teflon-type coating fume risk (nonstick coating degradation)

No nonstick coating present; this is bare stainless steel, so Teflon-type coating fume risk is eliminated entirely.

95/ 100
🧠

Lead

No enamel, glaze, or ceramic coating; bare stainless steel has no glazed surface to test or degrade.

Source: ATSDR
95/ 100

Coating degradation and chipping over time

No coating present, so there is no coating to chip, flake, or degrade into food.

95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

This pan is stainless steel with no nonstick coating, meaning no Teflon-family coating layer (Teflon-type coating/PFOA) and no ceramic or enamel glaze that could chip or leach. Stainless steel is chemically inert under normal cooking conditions and does not degrade into food at typical stovetop or grill temperatures. The lack of any coating significantly reduces the chemical hazard profile compared to nonstick or coated alternatives.

The brand's record and disclosure

Calphalon has not made public statements specifically addressing PFAS or chemical safety in their cookware lines. The brand has faced historical scrutiny over nonstick coatings in other product lines but has not faced documented recalls for lead, cadmium, or aluminum leaching in stainless steel cookware. No third-party certifications (NSF, FDA approval letters) are prominently documented for this specific model.

How it compares in its category

Stainless steel grill pans without nonstick coatings are among the safest options in the cookware category because they eliminate two major hazard vectors: Teflon-type coating fume risk and coating degradation. This is a more conservative choice than ceramic-coated or nonstick grill pans, which carry potential for chipping and leaching. Cast iron and bare stainless steel dominate the low-chemical segment of this category.

If you buy it

Use metal or silicone utensils to avoid scratching (though the bare steel surface is less vulnerable than coated pans). Preheat gradually rather than over high heat immediately, as rapid temperature swings can warp the pan over years. Hand wash or use the dishwasher; stainless steel tolerates both. Replace only if structural damage (warping, handle loosening) occurs, not for surface wear.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 82% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Calphalon has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Safer alternatives in Grill Pans

GreenPan Valencia Pro Ceramic Nonstick 11" Round Grill Pan

GreenPan

Valencia Pro Ceramic Nonstick 11" Round Grill Pan

Ceramic nonstick coating (Teflon-type coating-free proprietary formulation)

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade78Excellent
🔩

Aluminum leaching from base material

Limited concern

70

Ceramic coating degradation and mechanical wear

High concern

20

Lower-concern choice; ceramic nonstick with credible PFAS-free positioning and third-party certification.

MADE SAFE Certified

Risky category by default

GreenPan Chatham Ceramic Nonstick Grill Pan

GreenPan

Chatham Ceramic Nonstick Grill Pan

Ceramic nonstick coating (proprietary, Teflon-type coating-free)

PFAS Grade90Excellent
Overall Grade60Good
🔩

Ceramic coating degradation and aluminum exposure

High concern

20
💨

Thermal decomposition of ceramic nonstick (off-gassing)

Limited concern

70
🔩

Aluminum core leaching

Limited concern

70
🫧

Microplastic or coating particle shedding into food

Limited concern

70

Lower-concern option; ceramic nonstick avoids traditional Teflon-type coating, though third-party testing would help.

Risky category by default

GreenPan Bobby Flay 11" Cast Iron Square Grill Pan

GreenPan

Bobby Flay 11" Cast Iron Square Grill Pan

Cast iron with thermolon coating

PFAS Grade90Excellent
Overall Grade72Good

Coating degradation and leaching

Limited concern

70
💨

Thermal fume risk from coating

Limited concern

70
🍂

Ceramic coating chipping hazard

Moderate concern

45

Lower-concern cast iron option, but thermolon coating remains unverified by independent testing.

Risky category by default

More grill pans grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.