PFAS75/ 100Excellent
Overall53/ 100Good
Chanel Ultra Le Teint Flawless Finish Foundation

Chanel · Makeup

Chanel Ultra Le Teint Flawless Finish Foundation

Excellent

Lower concern, but no transparency on ingredient coatings.

Verdict · BuyWater-based formula with no major known hazards; lower PFAS concern mitigated by established brand safety record in cosmetics.

Chanel provides no public PFAS disclosure for this foundation. Liquid cosmetics typically pose lower PFAS risk than waterproof formulas, but ingredient transparency is limited.

Check price on Amazon →

We flunk more products than we pass. This one earned its grade. How we grade

Material

water-based liquid foundation with pigments and polymers

Lab data

No public lab test

You may also be interested in

Top-graded picks in the categories readers replace first, every one scored on the same rubric.

  • polypropylene filter housing, carbon/sediment cartridge
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Bacterial growth in spent cartridges

3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

  • RO membrane, carbon filters, stainless steel housing
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Bacterial and microbial growth in housing and filters

4 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Avocado Vegan Mattress

Avocado

Vegan Mattress

100ExcellentPFAS grade
✓ MADE SAFE Certified✓ Global Organic Textile Standard (GOTS)
  • organic cotton, natural latex, coconut coir, recycled steel coils
  • The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
  • Heavy metals

2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

What Chanel Ultra Le Teint Flawless Foundation is made of, ingredients and materials

Chanel Ultra Le Teint is a water-based liquid foundation containing pigments (iron oxides, titanium dioxide), polymers for wear and adhesion, and standard emollients. Water-based formulas carry lower volatility risk than oil-based or silicone-heavy alternatives. The pigment load is typical for full-coverage foundations and does not inherently pose heavy-metal concern at cosmetic-grade concentrations, though sourcing and QC matter.

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

80/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Water-based liquid foundations commonly use preservatives such as phenoxyethanol or parabens rather than formaldehyde donors, but Chanel's full ingredient list is proprietary. If present at all, levels would be below 0.2% by regulation in most markets. No specific warnings exist for this product.

Source, ATSDR ↗
70/ 100
⚠️

Fragrance allergens and sensitizers

Chanel Ultra Le Teint contains fragrance, which accounts for a proportion of reported user sensitivities and contact dermatitis in luxury foundations. Individual reaction depends on skin type and preexisting fragrance sensitivities; this is a known feature of Chanel formulations rather than a defect.

45/ 100
🏭

1,4-dioxane as manufacturing contaminant

1,4-dioxane can arise as a byproduct in ethoxylated ingredients used in emulsifiers and preservatives. Chanel does not publicly commit to dioxane removal, and independent testing data for this specific product is not available. Regulated markets impose limits; presence at unsafe levels is unlikely but not transparent.

70/ 100
🫧

Microplastic particles or persistent synthetic polymers

Liquid foundations often contain acrylate copolymers or siloxanes for wear and film-forming. These are not 'microplastics' in the marine sense but are persistent synthetics. No evidence this product contains intentional microbeads, but ingredient transparency is limited.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

✅

Base material not linked to PFAS

The main material recorded for this product is not one associated with PFAS.

100/ 100
🧠

Lead

Chanel products sold in regulated markets (US, EU) must comply with cosmetic metal limits. No recalls or testing warnings are on public record for this foundation. Titanium dioxide and iron oxides are the primary colorants and are approved at cosmetic grade.

Source, ATSDR ↗
95/ 100

How is this PFAS grade calculated?

The brand's record and disclosure

Chanel does not publicly disclose detailed ingredient sourcing or PFAS-screening statements, placing it in the industry mainstream but not the transparency tier of brands like Beautycounter or Elate. The brand operates under EU Cosmetics Regulation compliance (if sold in Europe) and US FDA oversight, both of which prohibit known carcinogens and set heavy-metal limits. No significant recalls or safety controversies have been widely documented for this specific product.

How it compares in its category

Ultra Le Teint sits in the premium luxury segment. Its water-based profile is safer than talc-powder foundations (talc contamination risk) and comparable to mid-market water-based foundations (e.g., Estée Lauder Double Wear, MAC Face & Body). Silicone-heavy alternatives (e.g., Fenty Beauty Pro Filt'r) may carry marginally higher synthetic-chemical load, though no proven hazard difference exists at normal use.

If you buy it

Store in a cool, dry place away from direct sunlight to prevent ingredient degradation and oxidation of pigments. Do not heat the bottle or apply near flame. Discard if separation, discoloration, or odor develops, typically after 12 months of opening. If skin sensitivity emerges, discontinue and patch-test to isolate the trigger; fragrance and preservatives are common irritants in liquid foundations.

What is not known about PFAS in this product?

Basis
Model estimate, 72% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Chanel has made a specific claim

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

More makeup grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.