PFAS75/ 100Excellent
Overall61/ 100Good
Clinique Superbalanced Makeup

Clinique · Makeup

Clinique Superbalanced Makeup

Excellent

Lower concern. Typical mineral-based makeup with no known PFAS triggers.

Verdict · BuyTalc-based powder with lower PFAS concern and no established heavy-metal or formaldehyde issues on record; standard cosmetic safety profile.

Clinique Superbalanced Makeup uses standard talc and mineral pigments without waterproofing or stain-resistance coatings. No PFAS disclosure found, but cosmetic formulations of this type rarely contain PFAS.

Check price on Amazon →

We flunk more products than we pass. This one earned its grade. How we grade

Material

Talc, mineral pigments, silicone

Lab data

No public lab test

You may also be interested in

Top-graded picks in the categories readers replace first, every one scored on the same rubric.

  • polypropylene filter housing, carbon/sediment cartridge
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Bacterial growth in spent cartridges

3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

  • RO membrane, carbon filters, stainless steel housing
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Bacterial and microbial growth in housing and filters

4 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Avocado Vegan Mattress

Avocado

Vegan Mattress

100ExcellentPFAS grade
✓ MADE SAFE Certified✓ Global Organic Textile Standard (GOTS)
  • organic cotton, natural latex, coconut coir, recycled steel coils
  • The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
  • Heavy metals

2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

What Clinique Superbalanced Makeup is made of, ingredients and materials

Clinique Superbalanced Makeup is a talc-based pressed powder foundation formulated with mineral pigments and silicone. Talc serves as an absorbent, slip agent, and coverage builder in powder cosmetics; silicone provides smoothness and wear. The mineral pigments (iron oxides, titanium dioxide, and mica) are inert colorants with established cosmetic safety records. This combination is typical for balancing formulas designed for oil control.

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

80/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
🪨

Talc, asbestos contamination risk

Talc ore deposits can contain asbestos fibers. No public asbestos testing results or supply-chain certification from Clinique is available. FDA does not mandate asbestos testing for cosmetic talc, making verification difficult for consumers.

70/ 100
💨

Talc, inhalation risk during application

Chronic inhalation of talc powder is associated with respiratory irritation and talcosis in occupational settings. Consumer-level risk from occasional makeup use is lower, but sensitive individuals or those with asthma should minimize powder inhalation.

45/ 100

What’s reassuring

✅

Base material not linked to PFAS

The main material recorded for this product is not one associated with PFAS.

100/ 100
⛏️

Heavy metals

Iron oxides, titanium dioxide, and mica used in this product are not documented sources of lead or cadmium in cosmetic formulations. No recalls or regulatory alerts for this specific product on heavy-metal grounds.

Source, FDA ↗
95/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

No formaldehyde-releasing preservatives are documented in Clinique Superbalanced Makeup ingredient lists. Silicone and mineral bases do not typically require formaldehyde-donor preservatives.

Source, ATSDR ↗
95/ 100
✅

Fragrance allergen content

This product is not listed as fragrance-free, but ingredient transparency regarding fragrance components is not public. Fragrance sensitizers are possible but not confirmed on record for this formulation.

95/ 100

How is this PFAS grade calculated?

The brand's record and disclosure

Clinique (Estée Lauder subsidiary) does not publicly disclose talc sourcing, asbestos testing protocols, or third-party certification of their talc supply. The brand has not faced significant recalls or regulatory action for this product. Estée Lauder has not issued category-wide PFAS reduction commitments, placing Clinique in the 'silent' stance group. No formaldehyde releasers or phthalates are documented in available ingredient lists.

How it compares in its category

Talc-based powders remain the market standard for foundation coverage and oil absorption; this product is typical, not differentiated by material choice. Alternatives using rice starch, bismuth oxychloride, or talc-free blends exist but are less common in prestige makeup. Clinique's inclusion of silicone is industry-standard for blendability. No evidence suggests this formulation deviates from category norms in contaminant risk or stability.

If you buy it

Store in a cool, dry place away from direct heat or sunlight to prevent powder cake-hardening or pigment degradation. Use a clean brush or sponge to minimize bacterial growth in the pressed cake; replace every 12-18 months or if discoloration or odor appears. Do not inhale powder particles when applying; use in well-ventilated spaces. If talc sensitivity or respiratory concern is a personal issue, consult a dermatologist before use.

What is not known about PFAS in this product?

Basis
Model estimate, 72% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Clinique has made a specific claim

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

More makeup grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.