PFAS65/ 100Good
Overall43/ 100Poor
Dior Backstage Face & Body Foundation

Dior · Makeup

Dior Backstage Face & Body Foundation

Good

Liquid cosmetic with no public PFAS disclosure. Uncertain risk.

Verdict · SkipModerate concern, uncertain PFAS risk plus standard cosmetic hazards (heavy metals in pigments, fragrance allergens) with no public safety disclosure from Dior.

Dior Backstage foundation contains typical cosmetic ingredients but provides no PFAS information. Public data insufficient to assess fluorochemical use in pigments or texture agents.

The better-graded swap

Rimmel Stay Matte Foundation

Rimmel

Rimmel Stay Matte Foundation

75/100 safety

75Excellent

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

pigments, silicones, polymers, glycerin

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What Dior Backstage Face & Body Foundation is made of, ingredients and materials

Dior Backstage Face & Body Foundation is a silicone and polymer-based liquid cosmetic with pigments, glycerin humectant, and fragrance. The silicone matrix itself is stable and not typically a leaching risk. However, pigments (iron oxides, titanium dioxide, synthetic colorants) and fragrance compounds are the primary chemical exposure points. No public information confirms whether this formula contains talc, bismuth oxychloride, or other problematic filler minerals, making full hazard assessment incomplete.

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

80/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
🧠

Lead

Iron oxide and synthetic pigments in foundations can be contaminated with lead or cadmium during manufacture. Dior has not published testing data or limits for this product. Dermal absorption is low but ingestion (hand-to-mouth, lip contamination) poses greater risk.

Source, ATSDR ↗
70/ 100
⚠️

Fragrance allergens and sensitizers

This product contains fragrance (ingredient not itemized publicly). Fragrance blends are common triggers for contact dermatitis and photoallergic reactions, particularly in face foundations. Sensitivity is individual and concentration is not disclosed.

45/ 100
⚠️

1,4-dioxane contamination

Silicone-based emulsifiers and polymers can be contaminated with 1,4-dioxane as a manufacturing byproduct. No public data confirms this product's dioxane level. Risk is low in rinse-off products but non-zero in long-wear formulas with extended skin contact.

70/ 100
🫧

Microplastics

Polymers in liquid foundations do not shed microplastics under normal use, but synthetic polymer particles are a known environmental concern when washed down drains. This is not a direct consumer health hazard but reflects product sustainability concerns.

Source, EPA ↗
70/ 100

What’s reassuring

✅

Talc or talc-like mineral contaminants

Dior Backstage is marketed as talc-free, but no third-party confirmation is on record. Silicone-based formulas typically do not require talc as filler, reducing this specific risk relative to powder or older liquid foundations.

95/ 100

The full breakdown

The brand's record and disclosure

Dior (LVMH) does not publicly disclose ingredient safety testing, heavy metal limits, or PFAS avoidance commitments for this product line. The brand has faced no major recalls for Backstage Foundation on public record, but lacks third-party certifications (e.g., Cradle to Cradle, EWG Verified) or transparent safety documentation. Ingredient lists are available via regulatory filing but chemical purity and contaminant screening standards are not stated by the brand.

How it compares in its category

Liquid foundations vary widely in pigment sourcing and contaminant risk. Dior Backstage sits in the prestige category with no published heavy metal testing, unlike some mass-market brands (e.g., L'Oreal) that voluntarily disclose limits. Indie and clean-beauty brands often provide third-party testing or EWG ratings; Dior does not. Price and brand prestige do not correlate with safety transparency in cosmetics.

If you buy it

Store in a cool, dry place away from direct heat or sunlight to prevent oxidation of fragrance and pigments. Discontinue use if rash, irritation, or sensitization develops (fragrance and synthetic dyes are common culprits). Do not ingest or apply to broken skin. Patch test on inner arm before full face use, especially if you have sensitive skin or a history of cosmetic allergies. Check expiration date; unopened shelf life is typically 3 years.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 45% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Dior has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Better-graded alternatives in Makeup

L'Oreal Paris True Match Hyaluronic Tinted Serum

L'Oréal

L'Oreal Paris True Match Hyaluronic Tinted Serum

75ExcellentPFAS grade
  • water, hyaluronic acid, glycerin, pigments, emollients
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • 1,4-dioxane contamination from emulsifiers

3 hazards checked on this product. See all of them.

bareMinerals Barepro 24HR Skin Perfecting Powder Foundation

Bare Minerals

bareMinerals Barepro 24HR Skin Perfecting Powder Foundation

75ExcellentPFAS grade
  • mineral powder, mica, iron oxides
  • Talc contamination or inhalation risk

2 hazards checked on this product. See all of them.

Bareminerals Matte Foundation Broad Spectrum Spf15

Bare Minerals

Bareminerals Matte Foundation Broad Spectrum Spf15

75ExcellentPFAS grade
  • mineral powder, mica, pigments
  • Heavy metals

3 hazards checked on this product. See all of them.

More makeup grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.