PFAS20/ 100Bad
Overall8/ 100Bad
Easton Power Pad

Easton · Sports Equipment Padding

Easton Power Pad

Bad

Unknown waterproofing treatment; brand silent on PFAS details.

Verdict · SkipNylon/polyester blend with undisclosed moisture treatment raises PFAS concern; no azo dyes or formaldehyde issues on record, but brand transparency is weak.

This moisture-wicking athletic garment likely has a water-repellent coating finish. Easton discloses no PFAS information, leaving treatment chemistry unclear.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

nylon/polyester blend with moisture-wicking treatment

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

You may also be interested in

Top-graded picks in the categories readers replace first, every one scored on the same rubric.

  • polypropylene filter housing, carbon/sediment cartridge
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Bacterial growth in spent cartridges

3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

  • RO membrane, carbon filters, stainless steel housing
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Bacterial and microbial growth in housing and filters

4 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Avocado Vegan Mattress

Avocado

Vegan Mattress

100ExcellentPFAS grade
✓ MADE SAFE Certified✓ Global Organic Textile Standard (GOTS)
  • organic cotton, natural latex, coconut coir, recycled steel coils
  • The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
  • Heavy metals

2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

What Easton Power Pad is made of, ingredients and materials

The Easton Power Pad is a nylon and polyester blend engineered for moisture-wicking in athletic wear. The synthetic fibers themselves are stable polymers with low leaching risk under normal wear. However, the moisture-wicking treatment applied to the fabric is not detailed by Easton, which is the core concern, water-repellent finishes on athletic textiles commonly use fluorinated compounds (PFAS) to function, though alternative non-fluorinated hydrophobic treatments exist.

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

70/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

65/ 100
♾️

PFAS

Moisture-wicking treatments on athletic textiles frequently employ PFAS compounds; Easton's non-disclosure makes presence impossible to rule out. Contact with skin during prolonged wear could enable dermal absorption.

Source, ATSDR ↗
70/ 100
⚠️

Antimony in polyester

Polyester component may contain antimony trioxide as a polymerization catalyst. Modern polyester typically has minimal residual antimony, but non-migration testing data for this specific product is not publicly available.

70/ 100
🫧

Microfiber shedding during washing

Nylon-polyester blends shed microfibers during machine washing. While the hazard is environmental and not direct-exposure toxicity, repeated laundering will release synthetic particles; cold water and gentle cycles reduce shedding.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

✅

Azo dyes (color fastness hazard)

No recalls or testing reports indicate azo dyes in Easton apparel. Standard nylon-polyester blends and major manufacturers typically screen for banned azo compounds, though independent verification is absent.

95/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Formaldehyde-based wrinkle-resist or shape-memory treatments are uncommon in modern athletic moisture-wicking pads; Easton does not market this product with such claims, so risk is low.

Source, ATSDR ↗
95/ 100

How is this PFAS grade calculated?

The brand's record and disclosure

Easton is a major sporting goods manufacturer with no public PFAS disclosure policy or commitment to phasing out fluorinated finishes in their apparel. The company has not published transparency reports on chemical use in textiles. This silence is notable because competitors in the athletic wear space have begun disclosing or eliminating PFAS; Easton's lack of engagement suggests either unaddressed use or intentional non-disclosure.

How it compares in its category

Athletic moisture-wicking pads occupy a middle tier of chemical risk. Higher-end brands (Patagonia, Arc'teryx) explicitly state PFAS-free durable water repellency or use alternatives. Mass-market athletic brands often remain silent on treatment chemistry, making Easton typical rather than exceptional. The nylon-polyester blend itself is standard; the unknown finish is the differentiator.

If you buy it

Wash separately in cold water before first wear to remove any residual coating or treatment chemicals. Avoid dry-cleaning, which may mobilize or concentrate any PFAS present. Standard machine wash on gentle cycle is appropriate. Replace when elastic or seams degrade (typically 50-100 wears for athletic pads). If the product carries no PFAS-free label after purchase, request product specification sheets from the retailer to clarify the finish chemistry.

What is not known about PFAS in this product?

Basis
Model estimate, 45% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Easton has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

What are the PFAS-free alternatives to Easton Power Pad?

Easton Pro Style Shock Absorbing Pad

Easton

Pro Style Shock Absorbing Pad

65GoodPFAS grade
  • Foam padding, likely EVA or polyurethane
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Formaldehyde / VOCs

4 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Find an alternative on Amazon
Easton Universal Padding Fit Kit

Easton

Universal Padding Fit Kit

65GoodPFAS grade
  • foam padding, elastic straps
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Polyurethane foam off-gassing (VOCs)

4 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Find an alternative on Amazon
La Pointique Four-Way Stretch Knee Sleeve Support Brace

La Pointique

Four-Way Stretch Knee Sleeve Support Brace

65GoodPFAS grade
  • Neoprene sleeve with nylon/spandex blend support straps
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Neoprene off-gassing (volatile organic compounds)

2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Find an alternative on Amazon

More sports equipment padding grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.