Easton · Sports Equipment Padding
Easton Pro Style Shock Absorbing Pad
Lower concern; foam padding unlikely PFAS source, but no disclosure confirmed.
These foam-based shock absorbers typically lack intentional PFAS use. Easton provides no PFAS statement, so standard diligence applies.
Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.
Material
Foam padding, likely EVA or polyurethane
Brand disclosure
Brand is silent on PFAS
Lab data
No public lab test
You may also be interested in
Top-graded picks in the categories readers replace first, every one scored on the same rubric.
- polypropylene filter housing, carbon/sediment cartridge
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Bacterial growth in spent cartridges
3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Aquasure
Premier Series 75 GPD Under Sink Reverse Osmosis Water Filtration System
- RO membrane, carbon filters, stainless steel housing
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Bacterial and microbial growth in housing and filters
4 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Avocado
Vegan Mattress
- organic cotton, natural latex, coconut coir, recycled steel coils
- The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
- Heavy metals
2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
What Easton Pro Style Shock Absorbing Pad is made of, ingredients and materials
Easton Pro Style pads use closed-cell foam, most likely EVA (ethylene-vinyl acetate) or polyurethane, both common in athletic protective gear. These foams are chemically stable once cured and do not readily leach into skin or sweat under normal use. The padding is typically bonded to a knit or woven textile shell; the shell material and adhesives are the primary chemical exposure vectors, not the foam itself.
What’s concerning
Category baseline
The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.
No PFAS disclosure
No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.
Formaldehyde / VOCs
The knit or woven shell covering the foam may use formaldehyde-based resins for wrinkle resistance or fabric stiffening, common in affordable athletic apparel. No specific testing or complaint record exists for Easton padding, but the risk is standard for this product category and price point.
Source, ATSDR ↗Azo dyes in shell fabric
If the outer textile shell is dyed with azo dyes (common in colored athletic wear), certain azo compounds can break down to carcinogenic amines under sweat and friction. Easton does not disclose dye sourcing; standard practice in this category leaves azo-dye risk unmitigated but not actively reported for this brand.
Adhesive volatiles (VOC/off-gassing)
Foam bonded to textiles typically uses polyurethane or acrylic adhesives, which may off-gas low levels of VOCs during initial use and storage. Odor is the primary indicator; ventilation during first wear and storage reduces any volatile exposure. No recalls or complaints specific to Easton padding off-gassing exist in public records.
Microplastic shedding from foam breakdown
EVA and polyurethane foams shed microfibers as they age, compress, or deteriorate, particularly in high-friction areas. Washing and storage (avoiding heat and UV) slow this process; shedding is environmental concern rather than direct health hazard during wear but contributes to microplastic accumulation in laundry wastewater.
What’s reassuring
Base material not linked to PFAS
The main material recorded for this product is not one associated with PFAS.
Skin irritation from fiber release
No specific complaints or recalls document skin irritation from Easton Pro Style pads. Dense, closed-cell foams are less likely to shed fibers directly than open-cell alternatives, and textile shells typically provide a barrier. Risk is minimal for intact, properly maintained gear.
How is this PFAS grade calculated?
The brand's record and disclosure
Easton is a sports equipment manufacturer (owned by Easton Sports) with no widely documented chemical disclosure statements or certifications (such as OEKO-TEX or bluesign) specific to padding lines. No major product recalls for chemical contamination in protective gear have been issued for this brand in public records. The company maintains silent stance on PFAS and detailed material sourcing, which is typical for mid-tier sports brands but leaves specific composition unverified.
How it compares in its category
Shock-absorbing padding in athletic wear typically uses EVA, polyurethane, or neoprene foams, all of which carry similar low chemical risk profiles when used as insulation or impact protection. Easton's offerings sit in the mainstream price and safety tier; premium brands (e.g., some European sports lines) may carry third-party certifications, while budget alternatives sometimes use lower-grade adhesives. For protective sports gear, this product represents a standard risk baseline.
If you buy it
Wash padding according to garment care label instructions, typically in cool water to avoid adhesive softening or foam degradation. Avoid prolonged exposure to heat sources (dryers on high, direct sunlight storage) as polyurethane and EVA can break down over time when heated. Replace pads if foam becomes visibly compressed, cracked, or separates from the shell, as protective function declines and microfiber shedding may increase. Inspect seams and adhesive bonds periodically for peeling or delamination.
What is not known about PFAS in this product?
- Basis
- Model estimate, 72% confidence, not a lab result
- Lab test
- None on record for this exact product
- Brand statement
- Easton has made none
Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.
More sports equipment padding grades
How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.