PFAS30/ 100Poor
Overall8/ 100Bad
Estee Lauder Set + Refresh Perfecting Makeup Mist

Estée Lauder · Foundation & Primer

Estee Lauder Set + Refresh Perfecting Makeup Mist

Poor

Waterproof cosmetic mist; PFAS risk unclear without ingredient disclosure.

Verdict: SkipAerosol mist with undisclosed water-resistant polymer likely contains PFAS; other cosmetic hazards appear standard, but lack of transparency on finishing agents warrants cautious use.

Aerosol makeup setting sprays often contain water-resistant polymers that may use PFAS, but Estee Lauder does not publicly disclose full formulation or PFAS status. No independent testing data available for this product.

The safe swap

NYX Professional Makeup Bare With Me Hydrating Jelly Primer

NYX Professional Makeup

NYX Professional Makeup Bare With Me Hydrating Jelly Primer

75/100 safety

75Excellent

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

liquid aerosol spray with silicone/polymer water-resistant finish

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

65/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

cosmetics is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

80/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

PFAS

Water-resistant makeup mists commonly use PFAS to repel moisture. Estée Lauder has not disclosed whether this product contains PFOA, PFOS, GenX, or other fluorinated alternatives. Skin absorption risk is low, but inhalation of fine spray particles may deposit PFAS in respiratory tissue.

Source: ATSDR
70/ 100
💨

Aerosol propellant safety and inhalation

Typical propellants (dimethyl ether, hydrocarbons, or HFC/HFO blends) are used; repeated inhalation, especially near face, can cause dizziness, respiratory irritation, or CNS effects at high exposure. No specific propellant information is published for this product.

70/ 100
⚠️

Silicone polymer accumulation on skin and tools

Silicone-based setting sprays can build up on makeup brushes, sponges, and skin over repeated use, potentially trapping bacteria and exacerbating acne or irritation in sensitive users. Estée Lauder mists are silicone-heavy formulations.

45/ 100
⚠️

Fragrance allergens and volatile organic compounds (VOCs)

Estée Lauder cosmetics typically contain fragrance blends; this mist may include fragrance to complement makeup. Fragrance compounds can volatilize from aerosol spray and trigger contact dermatitis or respiratory irritation in sensitive individuals. Specific allergen profile is not disclosed.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

⛏️

Heavy metals

No recalls or public reports of lead, cadmium, or arsenic contamination in Estée Lauder setting sprays. Standard cosmetic-grade pigments and stabilizers are unlikely to pose acute risk, but full assay data is not published.

Source: FDA
95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

This product is a liquid aerosol spray containing silicone and polymer-based water-resistant coatings designed to set and refresh makeup. The 'water-resistant finish' language typically signals fluorinated compounds (PFAS) or silicone polymers that repel moisture; Estée Lauder has not publicly disclosed which chemistry they use. Aerosol delivery means propellants and fine particle inhalation are exposure routes beyond skin contact, and the silicone/polymer matrix can deposit on skin, inhalation surfaces, and cosmetic brushes.

The brand's record and disclosure

Estée Lauder has not published a comprehensive PFAS policy or ingredient transparency statement for this product line. The brand does not disclose whether water-resistance is achieved through PFAS, silicone, or other chemistry. No recalls or public safety warnings specific to this mist are on record. The brand is not a signatory to organizations like ZDHC or campaigns pledging PFAS phase-out.

How it compares in its category

Setting and refreshing mists are increasingly common; many competitors (MAC Fix+, Urban Decay All Nighter) either disclose PFAS-free formulation or use silicone/glycerin without fluorine. Estée Lauder's silence on the water-resistant polymer is a notable gap compared to brands offering transparent ingredient lists. Price point and formula efficacy are competitive, but ingredient clarity is not a differentiator here.

If you buy it

Use in well-ventilated spaces to minimize aerosol inhalation; do not spray near face repeatedly. Store away from heat and direct sunlight, as propellant pressure and polymer stability degrade over time. Replace every 12-18 months; expired aerosols may spray unevenly and expose you to propellant leakage. If you have respiratory sensitivity or are pregnant, consider requesting the full ingredient and propellant list from Estée Lauder before purchase.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 45% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Estée Lauder has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Safer alternatives in Foundation & Primer

NYX Professional Makeup Pore Filler Primer

NYX Professional Makeup

Pore Filler Primer

silicone, talc, polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA), pigments

PFAS Grade75Excellent
Overall Grade67Good
💨

Talc contamination and inhalation risk

Limited concern

70
⚠️

1,4-dioxane and other solvent contaminants

Limited concern

70

Lower concern. Silicone-based primer unlikely to contain PFAS.

Risky category by default

NYX Professional Makeup Can't Stop Won't Stop Full Coverage Foundation

NYX Professional Makeup

Can't Stop Won't Stop Full Coverage Foundation

liquid foundation with water, silicones, pigments, preservatives

PFAS Grade75Excellent
Overall Grade59Good
🧠

Lead

Limited concern

70
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Limited concern

70
🏷️

Fragrance allergens and undisclosed components

Limited concern

70
⚠️

1,4-dioxane as preservative byproduct

Limited concern

70

Liquid cosmetics pose minimal inherent PFAS risk; no specific concern signals.

Risky category by default

CoverGirl TruBlend Skin Enhancer Primer

CoverGirl

TruBlend Skin Enhancer Primer

silicones, glycerin, water, pigments

PFAS Grade75Excellent
Overall Grade67Good
⚠️

Fragrance and fragrance allergens

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Silicone occlusion and skin comedogenicity

Limited concern

70

Lower concern. Primer lacks PFAS-risk features typical of cosmetics.

Risky category by default

More foundation & primer grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.