PFAS15/ 100Bad
Overall0/ 100Bad
Fissler M5 Pro-Ply 5-Ply Stainless Steel Non-Stick Frying Pan

Fissler · Cookware

Fissler M5 Pro-Ply 5-Ply Stainless Steel Non-Stick Frying Pan

Bad

Coating type remains unknown. Fissler has not addressed PFAS.

Verdict: SkipUnconfirmed non-stick coating chemistry plus silent PFAS stance creates uncertainty; solid stainless steel base mitigates other cookware risks if coating remains intact.

Fissler's M5 Pro-Ply has a proprietary nonstick coating that the brand won't describe. No public PFAS disclosure or independent testing exists for this pan.

The safe swap

Lodge Cast Iron Skillet

Lodge

Lodge Cast Iron Skillet

80/100 safety

80Excellent

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

5-ply stainless steel with proprietary non-stick coating

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Non-stick, chemistry undisclosed

Advertised as non-stick but coating type is not explained.

60/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

The company has not publicly discussed PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

cookware is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

70/ 100
♾️

Teflon-type coating fume risk (unconfirmed coating type)

Fissler's silence on non-stick chemistry means Teflon-type coating presence cannot be ruled out. If the coating is Teflon-type coating-based and overheated, polymer fume fever (flu-like symptoms) is a documented risk, though rare in domestic use.

70/ 100

Coating degradation and leaching

Non-stick coatings on all cookware degrade with use and heat exposure. As the Fissler coating breaks down, microscopic flaking can transfer to food; long-term systemic effects of ingested coating particles are not established but represent a cumulative exposure concern.

45/ 100
🏷️

Proprietary coating composition transparency gap

The primary consumer safety issue is Fissler's refusal to disclose coating chemistry. This prevents independent risk assessment and suggests the brand may be using conventional Teflon-type coating or similar legacy technology rather than newer alternatives it could market confidently.

20/ 100

What’s reassuring

Aluminum core leaching

The 5-ply construction keeps aluminum sandwiched between stainless steel layers and away from direct food contact, so aluminum leaching is not a documented concern with this product design.

95/ 100
🧠

Lead

This pan has no enamel or ceramic glaze coating; it uses a proprietary non-stick surface, so heavy metal glazing hazards do not apply.

Source: ATSDR
95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

The Fissler M5 Pro-Ply features a 5-ply construction (stainless steel outer layers with aluminum core for heat distribution) and a proprietary non-stick coating whose chemical identity Fissler has not publicly disclosed. The stainless steel substrate itself is inert and food-safe; the risk profile depends entirely on what that non-stick layer is and how it degrades. Without transparency on coating composition, consumers cannot assess whether it's a Teflon-type coating-based system, ceramic, or other technology, or what fume or leaching risks apply under normal or accidental overheating.

The brand's record and disclosure

Fissler is a long-established German cookware manufacturer with a reputation for quality engineering but has not published detailed ingredient disclosures or PFAS statements for this line. The company maintains certifications for food contact materials (e.g., EU compliance) but does not voluntarily provide third-party testing results for non-stick coatings or commit to PFAS-free claims. This silence is notably different from competitors who explicitly market Teflon-type coating-free or PFOA-free positioning.

How it compares in its category

Premium stainless steel non-stick pans typically occupy a middle ground: the stainless base is safer than bare aluminum for leaching risk, but proprietary non-stick coatings (especially unspecified ones) create uncertainty compared to ceramic or cast iron alternatives. Fissler's 5-ply design is competitive for heat distribution, but the coating opacity puts it behind brands that explicitly disclose Teflon-type coating-free or certified PFAS-free formulations. At this price tier, competitors like Miele or Le Creuset offer similar durability with more transparent material claims.

If you buy it

Never exceed medium heat and avoid preheating empty above 400F (204C), which can degrade non-stick coatings and trigger potential fume release. Hand-wash only; dishwasher use accelerates coating wear. Inspect the cooking surface monthly for flaking, discoloration, or loss of non-stick properties; discard if damage is visible. Store with a cloth between pan and lid to prevent coating scratches. Contact Fissler directly before purchase to request the non-stick coating material safety data sheet if PFAS status is a deciding factor.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 35% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Fissler has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Safer alternatives in Cookware

GreenPan Ceramic Non-stick

GreenPan

Ceramic Non-stick

PFAS Grade90Excellent
Overall Grade78Excellent

Coating degradation and integrity loss

Limited concern

70
🔩

Aluminum leaching

Limited concern

70
🫧

Microparticle shedding from coating

Limited concern

70

Low risk, safe to use.

Risky category by default

Scanpan Ceramic Titanium

Scanpan

Ceramic Titanium

PFAS Grade90Excellent
Overall Grade82Excellent
🔩

Ceramic coating degradation and aluminum leaching

Limited concern

70
🫧

Microplastic or particulate shedding from coating

Limited concern

70

Low risk, safe to use.

Risky category by default

GreenPan Chatham Ceramic Nonstick Frypan Set

GreenPan

Chatham Ceramic Nonstick Frypan Set

PFAS Grade90Excellent
Overall Grade82Excellent

Ceramic coating degradation over time

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Thermal shock and handle integrity

Limited concern

70

Low risk, safe to use.

Risky category by default

More cookware grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.